The SRK Science Thread 2.0

we might never understand consciousness but i think what’s important to remember is that religion is WRONG

there is no soul

although i do believe since we are gas, we are part of the universe, and when we die we return to the universe, so in essence we live forever, although our aspect of the universe (our consciousness) will never live again…

im willing to argue that any assertion/belief based on a lack of evidence constitutes a religious thought
whether it is borne of an “open” or “closed” mindset
including the above post

The difference is, with science, bold assertions go through a logical set of processes to see if the theory bears truth, even remotely. Also, it takes more “faith” to believe in a negative.

That being said, studying the most extreme and mysterious phenomena has humbled me from uttering the word “impossible” with nonchalance.

Fun Facts w/ Neil DeGRasse-Tyson:

http://chzschooloffail.files.wordpress.com/2012/08/london-olympics-roflympics-neil-degrasse-tyson-olympics-commentator.png

you’re inviting a tedious semantic argument to prove a tired point. if “believing” anything without running it through the scientific method makes you religious there isn’t really much point in distinguishing the two words.

right,
so believing in scientific findings would not fit the criteria i mad eup for ‘religious thought’

not semantics at all, and im not suggesting everyone run the scientific method, simply relying on credible sources is perfectly acceptiable
no, the scientific method is intended to mold an opened minded skeptic (in my opinion; hahaa)
im simply pointing out hypocrisy
somehow people seem to think that making a kneejerk opposing negative assertion is no different than pointing out flaws in a certain offending positive assertion

on the topic of consciousness,

I’ve noticed that humans are quick to readily believe in some transfer of consciousness to a world that transcends the physical world.

Could that be a biological construct created by our consciousness of death? From what I know, we are the only animals that go out of our way to slow down the process or try our best to stop it from ever happening. Could it be that our minds/consciousness develops this readiness to facilitate the process of death and make it bearable?

I think stuff like near death experiences and such are just a byproduct of hallucinations induced by various brain chemicals (or in case of NDE lack of oxygen to brain) and not necessarily transcending from a localized version of reality to a higher level of consciousness / higher plane of existence.

Anyone who has done hallucinogens will experience lots of sensations and feelings that will feel absolutely real but actually aren’t. Heck you dont even need drugs, just do some lucid dreaming, everything seems real enough. the brain does lie to us all the time, which means that anything we see or feel while being oxygen deprived or while on drugs isn’t necessarily true.

But even people who have never had those experiences, will not hesitate to believe in “life” after death in some form. It seems natural to believe in something like that. If it is, then is it an artificial construct wired into us, as a sort of coping mechanism to deal with our awareness of death.

Plate tectonics on Mars.

In the search for a cancer cure, researchers have developed a molecule that could function as a non-hormonal, reversible form of male birth control.

Kind of a poorly written article, but that’s science journalism for you. Anyway, it’s exciting news for people who like sex.

^ if its not peer reviewed its not real science, it’s media extrapolation of unknown facts.

And string theory fits in that category for example.

And commenting on the religion vs science debate I present the following:
Religion demands faith, something that is just deemed true, while science depends on math or “assumptions” thought to be true. Well math depends on axioms, statements that are unprovable and must be taken as true. So no matter how you slice it, there is uncertainty- you must place faith somewhere to get anywhere. Where you place it will take you different paths but we are all converging to the same limit IMO.

Why do I get the feeling that your post is using my post (which is, in itself, clear about its speculative nature) purely as a pretext to make a point about string theory?

nice reflexes

Because I linked them together, stating my opinion that they are very similar.

/rant

“We think there are ten dimensions because an equation ended up with (x-10)(some stuff we can’t solve)=0” - "that physist married to some CBS big wig.
He forgot to mention that equation stems from algebraic geometry which like all modern mathematics in the last hundred years, depends on the axiom of choice, a bullshit assumption that isn’t “obvious” at all.

Off-Topic, infinite sets don’t exist goddamnit. Fuck Cantor!

/rant

Proceed kind people, my family and friends are sick of hearing it. My apologies.

You should at least state your physics/math background or link to some sites that might be useful to back up your claims. What about Peter Woit for string theory and Wildberger for infinite sets? I don’t understand any of the physics stuff, but it’s always interesting to hear dissenting views that come from non-cranks.

He doesn’t know what stage during his coma he had his vision. He could have dreamt all that once his brain had healed and was in a normal state of sleep.

I just have an undergrad in theoretical math, I could recommend some books for the math portion. But as for string theory my whole point is there is nothing to link because there is no peer reviewed articles that support string theory… only the “history” channel and commercialized books.

I’ve wrestled with this too, but some cases where patients has undergone surgery where there are no signs of brain activity whatsoever or are undergoing surgery requiring the heart to be stopped yet experiencing the same levels lucidity described in other NDE cases. I’m not saying I’m a proponent of the phenomena, but it is intriguing hearing real life testimony and trying to dissect where the physical explanations neatly fit.

As for hallucinogens- similar to schizophrenics, maybe when on a chemically induced bender your brain can’t quite get a grip on reality, literally… If the objective reality we see is just a rounded down perception illuminated and mitigated by our brains. So if the brain gets disrupted in some way, the localized reality we all claim to experience starts to overlap with the other innumerable possibilities, however aberrant.

[media=youtube]5i_bUQxUuBk[/media]

As a person who’ve experienced lucid dreaming nightly until about 17 years of age, I can attest to the fact that the brain can create some incredibly lifelike manifestations. I used to remember creating entire cities with thousands of people, all unique. I could observe each simultaneously from different perspectives and watch traffic/ weather patterns from isometric points of view even while doing all this. No focus or concentration needed, the experience was completely and indescribably seamless. So yes, the brain is capable of complexities we have yet to truly realize.

I dismissed the NDE phenomena early on because of this thought process as well. I figure because of the “uniqueness” of the traumatic experience can make coma dreams feel surreal in a way regular dreams aren’t. I figure this guy would’ve seen through this already if that was the case; I wish I could have a conversation with him and probe his thoughts.

Mr.Hubcap: All I can say is that religious and scientific ponderings all originate from the same place, our malleable brains. Utilizing objective methods to prove subjective ideas is the best we can do, but still a step up from blind faith.

I was simply agreeing

but why the quotations?
hahaa

It was a response to the “open” or “closed” portion of your post.

<copacetic/>

http://www.doctortipster.com/10789-recent-study-links-t-gondii-parasite-to-suicidal-attempts.html

LAS PLAGAS!