Much later, but all this time removed - I question why in the hell Namco did not revive Conquest Mode from Soul Calibur 2 for the current online market. It was dumb fun going to the arcade and “fighting for my kingdom” with Raphael when no players were around for matches.
Seems like it would be a fun, harmless way to get more people into the game without the intimidation of playing other people directly.
Fuck all this fighting game talk, where my $1400 at Biden? 
The Biden/Harris administration have negotiated a deal with President of the World G and Mayor Mike Haggar to provide you with 1,400,000 in Covid Relief Fight Money.
So generous! 
Trapped in the house for the next budget to be discussed as the republicans argue americans need less help.
But the dems got the majority and we just need to have congress start on this. But again mitch mcconnel and his ilk will filibuster and hold for as long as they can
Dummies will get mad at the blues for not giving it right away and vote red because maybe they will do it only that the reds always held back
Like gop fast tracked bailouts for billion dollar companies and for farm workers creating the giant deficit.
The gop are now using the giant deficit they helped to create as an excuse to why they will not pass biden’s stimulus.
Fuck trump
The people that preach the loudest have the least skin in the game. On a global scale any single issue is a drop in the ocean and as the saying goes, “Everyone has a sad story to tell.”
Please do tell how preaching ever solves anything.
I am not sure how unique and thematically consistent a new Phantasy Star would be. It might just be better to not desecrate its legacy. However, the recent Monster Boy game is a nice reminder of SEGA’s enduring 16-bit legacy. Maybe they could do something interesting with Phantasy Star.
So because everyone has some skin in the game no one should speak up about anything? Your argument doesn’t make sense.
When has preaching solved anything? Never. Conflating making a statement with preaching tho is again more deflection from those who have nothing of merit to say on the issues being brought up and don’t like being faced with subjects they disagree with so they lable it preaching to devalue it and then can easily shove it aside and side step the whole “problem” all together.
Basically intellectual cowards. They act above it all but the truth is they don’t have the spine for a real conversation about real subjects.
To solve a problem one has to find its source and fix it. No quantity of statements is going to do that. That takes people getting their hands dirty. As the saying goes, “Shit or get off the pot.”
Again that’s side stepping the issue. In order to find solutions you must first identity the problem, then converse about how to solve the problem. You don’t even want the problem brought up.
No problem was ever solved by flat out ignoring it so your suggestion that any media making a statement is preaching is just you ignoring the issue because that’s more convenient for you.
Sidestepping an issue by using problem solving… that’s a new one. Almost like the problem is in somebody’s head…
You haven’t solved the problem. You haven’t solved anything. You’ve simply said “Don’t talk about it.”
What does that solve besides making your Media into a fast food equivilant?
No, I have just pointed out that if individuals put as much energy into solving problems as they do bitching about them the world would be a better place for them.
My media is predominantly decades old if not centuries. Half of it needs additional reading material to interpret. What is currently in circulation is regurgitated fast food.
https://twitter.com/itsbriancuh/status/1357449252025192448
https://twitter.com/Carlaurelie/status/1357646457998835712
Why do you assume making a statement is bitching? Again your being s coward and just calling them names to downplay and side step the issue entirely. What’s a piece of media entertainment that makes a statement by bitching about it?
Then how would you know what modern media is like if you primarily consume shit that’s old as fuck?
Again how would you even know? You just admitted you don’t consume it. You only consume old ads shit that you need secondary material to understand?
Making a single statement is starting a conversation. Repeating the same statement is revelling in the topic. If the topic is a problem then revelling in it is bitching.
I read things, overhear things, and see things as I go about my life and when others attempt to entice me to consume modern media after giving it a shot once more the result is aversion.
Example?
So you don’t have any examples and just parrot the things other people tell you?
Figures.
Example:
The neighbour’s dog is loud at night…
I hate that owner and that dog… (x???)
On the contrary, if something interests me I research different viewpoints on it and if it doesn’t I ignore it.
No example of media that bitches instead of talks. Fucking Christ no wonder you have to read secondary material to understand the shit you read.
Yea which proves my initial point. “I don’t want politics in my media” is code for “I don’t want politics I disagree with or am not interested in, in my media.”
People are fine with politics in their media as long as it’s something they align with.
Your initial point is null. I would ignore the ideological nonsense the same way I would a commercial selling a product that is irrelevant to me.
