The Fappening 2: The Second Cuming: Blue Balls Edition

If that person has a PHD, I’m a flamingo.

PHD = Playa Hatin Degree.

Also, THIS FUCKING GUY is CNN’s “Technology analyst”?

I mean listen to this fucking guy explain how a password deciphering program works.

It runs through every word in the dictionary? Bruh. The average password is more than a single word. Jesus christ man I’m a 1st year CMNW major in college and you made me feel embarrassed for you. Get it together.

What do you mean? Pa$$word is a great password, you’ll learn it in your 2nd year.

these man haters taking it all wrong. Paparazzi take and publish pics of celebrities all the time without their consent. Does that make them voyeurs or sex offenders now? It’s still wrong but this is a privacy breach not a fuckin “sex crime”

http://i.imgur.com/yAkWZGX.jpg

Source fed is on some bullshit.

Nigga, i would except the cure for cancer from hitler, because its the damn cure to cancer. Their double standard is also hilarious

Let’s be real here, I think the world is a better place because I an see Jennifer Lawrence naked whenever I want.

It’s like, how bad can my day really be, I’ll just go look at some boobs.

Thanks Jennifer Lawrences breasts.

Exactly.

I almost became violently ill after hearing about that.

There is no excuse, no logical reasoning for turning down thousands of dollars to help research cure and treatment of a literally life threatening disease, just because it’s from people who saw pictures of naked celebrities.

You can’t even say it’s because of publicity or saving face, because it’s fucking cancer research. There is no “I’m not going to donate for the research of a cancer because they took money from people who looked at celebrity nudes”.

This is the real injustice, the real tragedy here. I could give a damn about hackers, they need to put the prostate cancer people on blast for that shit.

Sickening, absolutely sickening.

Come on guys, if this keeps up legislatures may come up with ways to make fapping to nude photos illegal.

Secondly,I believe there is already cures for cancer, but fuck that companies in the medical field are making millions servicing cancer patients. Donating money for these organizations to find cures seems like a waste now. How many years has it been and how much money are they making from donations. My mom died from cancer. She decided to change her diet and was up and about eating herbs and healthy vegetable until she had chemo the doctor highly recommended. She almost died after the second visit when the chemo almost tore through her stomach. My aunt and uncle were healthy until they started that treatment. They all had the same result and died a painful death.

how in the hell did this turn into a cure for cancer thing?

  1. You’re an idiot.

  2. I’m sorry for your loses, I too have had close relatives die of cancer.

ESTHER “Perfection” BAXTER nudes would make my head explode. No pun intended.

Nina Dobrev would make my day too.

P.S., There are already Christina Hendricks nudes FYI. :wink:

someone pm me the curling iron pics.

First off, it’s been a long time Shadow. How have you been my man?

Second, Christina Hendricks ones I see don’t count because we don’t see her face. The rack is delicious in those nudes and it wouldn’t surprise me if it belonged to her, but if I can’t see her face it doesn’t count to me.

Esther nudes would probably leave me sore to the touch for a week. She is, body wise, the perfect woman in my book.

thats pretty shortsighted. charitable groups and famous people build relationships with each other because they know that both parties benefit from it. money for disease research->good publicity for public figure->repeat cycle. if an organization becomes associated with accepting money from people who knowingly violated somebody’s (read: rich people’s) privacy, they’re aware that they run the risk of losing out on more lucrative partnerships in the future with people who can relate to the victims (eg. just about any woman or public figure on earth).

besides, it should be fairly obvious to anyone with a functional conscience that the donations are essentially our way of saying “we know we’re doing something wrong and we’re sorry, so here.” people don’t apologize when they think they’re in the right.

all the pics were meh. lame shit. i can get better quality angles from /s/ free

What does that say about the character of those people?

Question

Whats more important? The cure to a disease? Or the feelings of some celebrities with huge pools of money and enormous support groups sad that some dude is masturbating to their whack ass naked photos?

“I was gonna go and buy these 10k shoes but i don’t want to anymore because some dude saw me naked. oh woe is me”

huffington post got called out for the same thing by either the daily show or colbert.