Invaded? They were let in. These people were seeking asylum and it was the right thing to do. Yes, there are problems but they can be fixed. It would be detrimental to Germany if they didn’t take in people period since their own population is on the road to decline anyway. A fix for that is allowing immigrants into the country.
Or do you just hate people from the Middle East and think they cannot assimilate to Western culture?
So Laura Ingraham did this:
I need video to make sure this isn’t a joke.
EDIT
LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL
https://twitter.com/ParkerMolloy/status/755926710147842048/photo/1
She caught herself making the biggest mistake of her career right there.
They were let in by Merkel, like I said. Tell me, where did you get the crazy idea that Germany is on the road to decline? Allowing hordes of uneducated unskilled migrants is a fix? These are talking points that establish you as delusional and insane.
Yes, Muslims are the only demographic of people that cannot assimilate into Western countries. France is only at 10% and they are having mass killings. It’s not really just people from the middle east, it’s just Muslims
Muslim migrants have essentially damaged and forced the Nordic countries to scale back on welfare.
How is accepting these people good. Most of them where from Syria anyway.
So if it’s the right thing to do, the U.S. should just open its borders to all of South, central America and Mexico because immigration is good? Lol with that shit son.
That’s not the question I ask. I am not looking to be led, the last thing I want is someone with numerous policies and ideas that require my involuntary participation or attendance.
I prefer the traditional role of the President, presiding over. To use a sports analogy the President should not be the Team Captain for their party trying to score, it was meant to be the referee.
All legislation and Military actions are supposed to start in the congress, the Presidents role in that is simply deciding whether to accept or reject their proposals. I don’t want the President leading an agenda.
I acknowledge that is not the contemporary way it has been done, but that’s a part of the problem of why the Government is off the rails.
I find that questionable. Her only accomplishments are being Elected twice through nepotism, shes neither passed nor authored any notable legislation her voting record is mostly in line with any establishment republican whom I have no support for. She voted for the overwhelming majority of every dumpster fires Bush started. Politicalcompass.org puts Trump left of Hillary. She’s 1-2 for presidential primaries and that was after extensive rigging and nepotistic favors against two poor candidates.
But lets say she has experience, being effective at passing things I don’t want is not a positive. I believe her intentions are malicious and she is not working in the interest of the population, on the other hand Bernie mightt be wrong about everything but I don’t doubt he is trying to improve situations. I believe in evil, there are hedonists who enjoy themselves by harming others. Hillary & Bill are these types of people.
It’s a real short list why I am supporting Trump.
[list=1]
[] 1. I want immigration laws enforced and the criteria for entry in to the U.S. to be choosy and thorough.
[] 2. Political correctness is out of control, It is Orwellian Huxley style thought policing/censorship.
[*] 3. Pragmatic opposition to the DNC which I find equally abhorrent as the RNC. I’ll jump for joy if Gary Johnson starts polling competitively, if I was voting conscious I’d write in Penn Jillette/Ron Paul for the rest of my life.
[/list]
I don’t vote based on left/right ideology usually. I vote Authoritarian vs Libertarian. I reject all unnecessary coercion, Government is an institution of a credible threat of violence against someone.
So when evaluating laws It simply comes down to one question, “Is violence justified, to control this behavior?”.
[list=1]
[] Murder, yes
[] Theft, yes
[] Bake gays a wedding cake, no. I think they should bake them cake but I am not going to point a gun at someone to make them nor let the government do it for me. I am going to tell them they are a dick and go to another bakery. No force or violence necessary.
[] Produce resources of an institution they don’t use or dislike. No.
[/list]
My bar for justified force is extremely high. I think person A should do X rarely justifies force.
You can encourage and induce plenty of positive behaviors without violence, no one needs a law to wipe their ass people do it because it benefits them. Yelp/google reviews for example does a better job at regulating restaurants than law enforcement and they do it without force. People have sticks and Carrots, government only has the stick. Total self sufficiency is a hobby of mine, I am down to an internet bill as far as utilities and we still have to grocery shop once a month. If it was feasible for me to launch a Satellite I’d be working on it. Beyond general security of the state I have no need of Government for anything.
So when I look at my obligations the only entity making demands of me or is detrimental to my interests is Government, now you tell me why it is logical I would want someone trying to lead me?
“We do not kneel.” - Mance.
Europe is going down the toilet.
In 50 years I’ll bet that muslims will have conquered and be the majority population in Europe.
White people got very few places to run to, besides somewhere like New Zealand or Aussie land LOL
Only country whose got immigration right is Japan. They was like screw taking in muslim migrants, we must take care of Japanese first and that was that lol.
Japan doesn’t only do that to Muslims, they do that to pretty much everyone. They have their own problems as their population ages.
Aging populations are a problem for capitalism I never understood how it’s a quality of life issue.
OH THE HORROR! People living a long time with disposable income…
Far as I know, Japan is a capitalistic country. So yeah, an aging population means less output.
But less output does not necessarily = Lower quality of life.
I don’t understand economics to go into a whole thing about it, but I would imagine that if you have less output as a capitalistic country you will have less money coming into your country. You can’t even create a solid market within your own borders because there’s less money to create demand, causing inflation.
no, increase demand and increase spending increases inflation.
decreased demand and decreased spending increases the value of money
what happens is that if there is no demand or production within your country, inflation goes up because you import from other countries and you have to trade your money for the money of the nation you are trading with and or reserve currency. Japan is lucky that their useless yen is actually important so these effects haven’t fucked them as hard as they could.
What japan needs to do is have more kids, importing labor is retarded, especially when that labor does not align with the core values of your society.
Razor doesn’t know why a contracting population in Japan is bad other than whatever the MSM narrative feeds him. By his insane logic Japan needs to have open borders like Germany since they on the path to decline since that is the only way to fix it.
Use robot workers instead of human ones and output is no longer dependent on meatbags. Problem solved.
from what i’ve heard, the supposed problem is that they don’t have neough workers to pay the old people retiring.
look at that, the sham that is socialism requires highly paid and a constantly growing source of income. it needs capatalism to stay solvent. LOFL
Alex Jones crashed the Young Turks RNC coverage. Cenk and Jones almost got into a fight.
This election cycle is the best cycle.
There are towns in Germany that had a hundred people, and they dumped 700 refugees on them.
Totally reasonable…
Love Alex Jones for doing that lol
Michael Moore: Trump is going to win
One of the videos is gone, this is so winning.
Wait, people actually take Alex Jones and his conspiracies seriously? LOL at that shit.