Milo attention whores but he is correct on the issues and one of the very few men that can defend men against Sjw’s and feminists.
Alt-right started off as a non-cucked version of the right but, yes, it’s now imploded into a bunch of racist whites. Very sad. They are irrelevant now and I’m not sure if Milo or breitbart is with them. They are pro-trump, that’s for sure.
What I don’t get is how/why blacks want Hillary so bad but not Berny. My guess is most blacks vote whomever Obama supports because blackness. Blacks are low information voters that look to whoever looks like them, that’s racist yo. Hillary doesn’t care about blacks. She made 100’s of millions over the last 30 years and ghettos are still ghettos. She’ll say nice things about blacks but you know she does not give a fuck. She only cares about getting more power and money and making you pay for it.
I have often wondered the same thing. The black community loves the democratic party, but what you have to wonder what real incentive the democratic party has to fix that community when a poor black community is going to 100% vote democrat and and wealthier blacks tend to vote republican. I think the argument could be made that helping black people is against their self interest, so they will instead just arbitrarily throw money at problems knowing that this will not fix the situation but it gives the appearances of “helping.”
All the Dems really need is a solid Veep attached to Hillary’s ticket, and they’ll be golden.
Impeach away.
And yes, I realize she will have to resign to pull that off.
So fuckin’ be it.
In principle, I agree that Breitbart’s pandering to the alt right is disgusting. But I think it’s also understandable
America is in a midst of a radicalising age. Not too long ago, the word “socialist” would’ve used as a slur. Now it’s worn as a badge of honour. People are openly celebrating the murder of cops, and the left was effectively able to paint the idea of effective, secure, border control as racist in itself, albeit with some help from Trump.
We live in a universe of action and reaction. The left’s play book is to push it’s agenda while painting anyone who disagrees as morally reprehensible. This effectively alienates anyone who disagrees with them.
The standard bearer for the centrist right will forever be tarred for their involvement in the Iraq War. The standard bearer for the centrist left is literally either criminal or grossly inept.
There are really few places left to stand anymore. Politics at the heart of it is about numbers and coalitions. Political media is about eyeballs and bias confirming for the largest coalition you can. Breitbart is trying to pander to a growing coalition of conservatives who are opposed to the neo-con centrist conservatives who defined the Republican party of the past. They are no less ridiculous than left websites who argue that riots and cop murders are a “natural consequences of systematic racism”.
What’s happening at Breitbart is simply a symptom of the growing radicalisation which ails America.
Edit: I’m not saying that one should therefore just read Breitbart like a credible news source. But in an environment where every news source is pushing an agenda, Breitbart is a valid and important part of a balanced media diet, especially if you don’t want to be caught flat footed if Trump wins in November.
Breitbart has a bald-faced agenda: promote extreme conservatism. To think otherwise is laughable.
I’m still laughing at that shit. I mean, to say Breitbart is not conservative is to pretty much admit you have no idea who Andrew Breitbart is.
Imo what is happening in American politics is the two party system is maybe about to change a bit. The Republican party is on its last legs and is eventually going to go the way of the Green party or something similar, ie, a “fringe” party that gets a few votes, but ultimately poses no threat at all. The Democratic party is going to be the dominant party, but it is going to be divided between the more moderate wing and the ultra progressive wing. Eventually it will probably split into two separate parties. Realistically all this probably won’t happen for another 50 years or so, but that’s the direction it’s headed imho
Democratic-Republicans? 
Or are they Whiggin’ out?
I would have agreed with you about the Republican party being phased out but that was before Trump. After this guy wins in November there’ll be a short revival of R’s. I imagine R’s will have to go left of D’s after Trump quits or die
:mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad:
$HILLARY
:mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad:
This ignorant conflation of terms never ceases to sadden me.
Capitalism.
Market Economies.
Completely different things.
There will be no loyalty, except loyalty towards the party. There will be no love except the love of leaders. There will be no laughter except the laugh of triumph over a defeated enemy. There will be no art, no literature, no science. …And no escape.
Fixed.
Again why are people pretending Hillary is any better when she isn’t.
They’re both monstrous.
Hillary is less monstrous and less willing to pander to fear.
Well, until she wants to start a war. Then I don’t think she’ll be any different than Bush.
Hillary looks more like a monster.
shudders