We aren’t assigning points if you didn’t play a particular match-up. No one is getting free wins and no one is losing wins. The two options are simply: (1) Rank by raw game-win percentage OR (2) Rank by game-win percentage with player-win comparisons.
The problem with the first option is that someone could literally play 13 matches and be ranked #3 because of his raw game-win percentage, but NEVER played a single person in the top 10. Compare that to someone that isn’t ranked but played every person in the top 10 and has a record of .500 against them (including BEATING the #3 ranked guy).
Hence why I think we need to go with option two and compare wins to try and balance out who beat who. We aren’t assigning a value to anyone. Just comparing wins. And the best way to do it is in 2’s. For example: Say you’re being compared to another player [named: comparison] and we are going to look at a specific [opponent] you both played… if YOUR opponent beat your comparison AND you beat your opponent… then you get the adv over your comparison… understand?
The tricky part comes in when you have comparisons that don’t have that many common opponents. Because then you have to compare opponents of opponents wins, etc, etc.
This has to be the fairest way to do this because no one is associated with a value and you can’t get necessarily get a top spot with “easy” wins.
We will be in around 3:00 on Friday. Josh wants to come play at the arcade but I just can not sit there Friday and Saturday too (that is serious video game overload). Is anyone going to be there Friday? Shawn said he probably couldn’t play and I know Jason leaves early alot, so anyone else? I don’t want to just drop Josh off without someone there I know. Not that Josh needs a babysitter but I have seen some of the people that come in that mall. Hahaha!
1 thing is true about the rankings! I just really understood what was going on this past Saturday. After all is said and done (rankings), the challenges will be epic!
It’s kinda suck to play by yourself. I feel like the amounts of “mobs” they have at certain points is cool for a group of players rather than just lil ole me. I think there’s a point in the 2nd level where there are easily 15 guys on screen. Kinda overwhelming sometimes. Also, I can’t counter attack for shit.
Richard and Shawn will be running the tournament on Saturday, I will be in Kingsport for an auction all day Saturday…they will be handing all questions/tournament stuff at the venue and I will post the rankings and scoring as soon as I get them…
So my mom just called and would NOT shut up about this Jackie Evancho girl that was just on America’s Got Talent. She insisted on staying on the line until I looked her up on youtube. She mentioned that they just had a “Susan Boyle Moment” on stage, and that one of the judges said that we’d all wake up tomorrow and the world would be a different place.
Me being the skeptic I am, [media=youtube]0et5xcXvQns"[/media]. Holy shit, it’s like the girl swallowed an angel or something. Her voice is amazing. o_O
I beat it on the hardest, or at least I did after I realized it was on easy after beating the first level and then putting it up to hard… it didn’t give me the trophy.
Hmm, maybe I should go beat the first level on hard and then beat the game again.
I just finished the game and I’m waiting for the credits to finish rolling.
Edit: So there is an optional game mode. At the title screen input DUR DUR DURR and you will unlock “Survival Horror” mode. Basically it’s a “Kill a bunch of zombies until you die” game.
Posting spoilers for new games is pretty much bad form no matter what. Of course he can simply turn off his entire interaction with the net and ignore any post that begins with “Scott Pilgrim Rules.” But, proper etiquette suggests that he shouldn’t have to and that it’s appropriate to remind people who forget.
There is no need to “turn off his entire interaction with the net.” Some common sense could be used. If he sees the first post about something he doesn’t want to read, then someone immediately quotes something in response to it, don’t read the response. It’s that simple. You can’t expect people to not discuss something they’re excited about. Much more irrelevant stuff has been discussed here, and this isn’t exactly a place for etiquette in the first place–anything that doesn’t get you banned pretty much flies.
I’ll reveal stuff for old TV shows that only I watched because I have no tact.
Everyone in Lost is already dead.
Felicity gets married.
Michelle Williams dies at the end of Dawson’s Creek.
Sunnydale gets destroyed at the end of Buffy.
Logan beats up some guy at the end of Veronica Mars.