“Gay being a lifestyle is like saying Zatalcon being a dumbass is a lifestyle.”
Yeah, no. You fucked it up.
Let’s not get into a debate over your inability to articulate a basic idea, though, and instead focus on Zatalcon being even dumber than you.
You two are on the same side.
Show me how I fucked it up then. Please, I’d like to know how I botched making those two things out to be equal, well before you came in and did the same damn thing.
Or don’t, and keep acting like this attempt of yours to make yourself look smart is not like Zatalcon trying to make himself not look like you.
Why is there an age of consent? If the person feels like he/she wants to marry, then what business is it? You see how it works? Who cares what your opinions of incest are… people think homosexuality is gross, but you seem to support it anyway. Cousins can actually reproduce with out falling victim to mutation… people during the old times married their cousins just to keep the blood strong in their line. Get over it man, you only support homosexuality just because religion has been against it. You have no rational reason why just based on how piss poor you’ve tried to reason against the other sexual preferences. Go and throw all your insults about how i am dumb, gay or whatever you want because that is all you can do.
You really a good damned moron.
@ThePurpIeBunny and @spudlyff8fan, congrats!
Gay marriage is legal, you two can get a room now.
The children.
No I’m, serious. [details=Spoiler]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g8YR9IV9Alc[/details]
^If you think thats ok then there is something wrong with your morals.
You might as well support children getting sex changes as well. Or is that the line you draw?
Homosexuality is the slippery slope as is transgenders.
http://pastebin.com/aiTLKLJc#
There’s a pastbin on reading into more of way its a problem.
Or call me and idiot/bigot.
Fine by me, if you’ve guys learned nothing from gamergate, then nothing is gonna convince you.
Oh good Lord another one and he tried to drag gamer gate into it to lol.
(I’m gone for months and come back to see people still getting baited by Zatalcon’s possibly real stupidity. Good to know some things never change.)
I’m…not sure how I feel about this, to be honest. It’s “good”, but:
On the one hand, this is “good” even though this shouldn’t have even come for debate in first place in the sense that it’s a basic decency issue about simple equal rights on a legal level. If people weren’t so (literally) enamored of marriage as a romantic and/or religious institution rather than the purely legal one that it is, they might be able to see. Then again, this is humanity we’re talking about. We’ve never been good about doing the decent thing, especially for minorities, unless we’re basically forced to or guilted into it.
On the other hand, while this passing is “good” and gets rid of some bullshit on the legal level, it’s probably going to end up like Roe v. Wade in that it just ends up polarizing people (further) rather than letting things “evolve” naturally–not that a lot of the South even believes in evolution, but you know what I mean. Sure, some people would have doubtless been horribly fucked over in the meantime, but what else is new? now this is going only to strengthen the resolve of hardliners who believe that America is “falling apart” and that “marriage is being threatened” and stuff like that. As such, I cynically fully expect someone to (at least try to) attack one of the pride events this weekend because of it among other increases in gay-bashing and anti-gay stuff, like all that evangelist aid to Uganda.
So…yeah, I guess is “good” overall, but between there being evidence in European countries that legalizing “gay marriage” doesn’t stop non-heterosexuals from being treated like second class citizens in a lot cases, which isn’t stopping (here) any time soon either way, and the result of this ruling being almost inevitable even without the Supreme Court’s “help”–nice to have more proof that Scalia and Thomas are idiots, though–on the matter…yeah. I’m not really sure how much this actually changes other than (hilariously) pissing some people off and, ironically, making it easier for people to get divorced (if they move out of state).
Shrug. Go “marriage equality” and “historical moment”, I guess.
(P.S. What the fuck kind of surname is “Obergefell” anyway? Regardless, in your face, Hodges.)
Unfortunately, he probably won’t go through with this once he realizes that setting himself alight will make him too Buddhist to get into Heaven.
realizes almost no one will get that reference
Oh, who am I kidding? He’ll unfortunately forego doing it since he’s too much of a cowardly, hypocritical idiot in every other regard as it is. So what’s being a cowardly, hypocritical idiot in one more way really while continuing to appeal to his own egotism?
(Note: I’m not saying being “uncomfortable” with “gay marriage” automatically makes you cowardly or hypocritical or idiotic, much less bigoted. This even though I would obviously encourage people to logically examine why they are made uncomfortable by it if they bring up any reason that isn’t solely based in religion or essentially saying some vague stuff about “family” that doesn’t also often apply to heterosexuals.)
Im still waiting till bigamy is legal.
I’m being serious: Have you read all of those articles?
That’s a shitload. Like, a real lot. I stopped watching my show to look at all that. I read a couple and scanned some headlines. Interesting.
Z, why not quote me?!
I have said my reasons before. I am unsupportive of gay marriage because of how pop culture glorified it and made people think of it as a race. In short i dislike anything that does not stick to the facts, homosexuality is a sexual preference therefore it is in the context with the rest of the sexual presences. Therefore when you make arguments as to why it should be supported please clarify why other preferences should be unsupported regardless of it being out of the persons choice.
Since all i got was attacks on my intelligence with out any actual dissecting of my arguments, it makes me conclude that the whole support is really just a rebellious acts against religion not on actually rationality.
Now he calls it a sexual preference instead of a lifestyle.
Sexual preference is a lifestyle choice.
That’s because anyone who makes the argument that gay marriage also means child fucking should be ok to isn’t worth addressing. Your points are garbage and aren’t worth giving the time of day.
In my defense I didn’t know.
@Shogunz @Tameem
I hope you 2 are happy with one another. SWbeta will forever live as the side piece.
You’ve added nothing other then calling people idiots and agreeing with others you agree with.
My point still remains.
@"The Damned"
There are reasons why being to liberal is destructive. And this is one of the reasons.
You didnt address my main point of corrupting younger generations into accepting it as normal.
Whats next? Bestiality, Pedophilia, Transgender? Where do you draw the line?
(Thanks for pointing out my typo.)
You’ve asked to consider the good and bad outcomes of it and I have. You seem to only accept what is deemed “right” or act for equality.
In other words and your own words, you act for feelings rather than facts.
But not question your own stance but instead place that standard onto people saying otherwise and assuming to moral authority.
I dont see it as beneficial at all. I could ask you consider my point and Zatalcon points. (Even if Zatalcon is seemingly more “trollish”)
But if you must. There is a reason why the American Psychiatric Association had homosexuality as a mental illness.
^
That story was first published as 2 “progressive” dads doing good.
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/1701569/GingerGorman_ABC_TwoDadsAreBetterThanOne.pdf
Damn Freezing dipping in that hater juice mad hard. Stay trolling.