A study that has been criticized by over 150 legitimate scientists at major universties and was funded by a conservative think tank named The Witherspoon Institute. Color me shocked.
It does and the funny thing is, i’m not even a christian or any form of theist but you can see my posts getting christian bashed + fishjie calling me a bible thumper? This shit is just an “f-u christianity”, if they actually did support this because of it being positive then i would not have been attacked with Christian bashing and much more homo-erotic posts in attempt to offend me.
I don’t believe in Christianity or any religion involving a personal-righteous judge- god based on the amount of injustice in this world. Regardless of my uncertainty of the religion i am not just going to bandwagon random issues because they are against it.
Right, so when 2 underaged kids want to get married or a 15 year old with his 20+ teacher we should just let them do what they want, they are not hurting us anyway and our points of view are meaningless compared to their feelings. You got to be fair to the rest of the sexualities and relationships.
Isn’t “Kiss the bride” thing only done in ceremonies and not getting your marriage license? I’m not sure how people apply to be married through government, but I thought it was just filling out paper work and doing taxes. As far as adopting kids, I wonder if kids really do get shitted on for having same sex parents, I’ve never heard of any of my peers in school that had 2 dads/moms.
Funny how THEY have no studies of their own, and just want us to buy what they say. Also, a letter from one of MANY now-adult children raised by lesbians. They’re willing to speak out, but the left ain’t having that cuz it hurts their narrative, so it’s ignored. The kids are not all right. They’re saying that themselves. I’d believe someone who lived it rather than someone trying to slap a feel-good sticker on it, while living on the outside, barely glancing in.
I went to school with kids who had same sex parents and no one gave a fuck. Sure you’ll get those assholes who’ll talk shit about your parents, but they’ll do it regardless if they were same sex, or man and female.
Its SRK, a lot of dudes probably the spawn of failures who couldnt even get a normal marriage to stick together let alone comprehend the difference an upbringing by 2 gay dudes or 2 lesbos would be like. So am gonna break it down and make it easy for everybody. Its exactly like this.
[details=Spoiler]
Raised by dogs then suddenly the kids new best friend is a ‘bear’. Probably ends up dying to a fucking tiger cause disney doesnt cut it in real life n cause some smart ass in office figured wtf. [/details]
Sorry, but you are wrong. Slippery slope is only fallacious when it presumes to make huge jumps in progressive logic.
Slippery slope as a construct is in itself dubious because it cannot define what is a “huge jump” versus what is an actual logical jump.
Slippery slope as a fallacy states that “A” begets “B” begets “C” so therefor in a logical progression, “A” begets “Z” since we will obviously get to Z someday.
But A begets B Begets C isn’t slippery slope. It is simply a logical progression. “A” begets “Z” is the actual slippery slope in its fallacial form.
The problem with slippery slope as a fallacy used in an argument is that it presumes that there is no middle point stopping ground.
But dumb people see ANY logical progression argument as being slippery slope fallacy.
Slippery slope being called out as a fallacy when it presumes huge jumps is a good way of bringing to light one persons inaccuracies of argument. However using slippery slope or any other argumentative fallacy (such as strawmanning or circular reasoning) in the wrong situations (especially slippery slope) is even more detrimental than the fallacy that the original term is trying to call into question:
Slippery slope used in the wrong way as a way to call out inaccurate arguments (that are actually accurate) is an argument against LOGIC in itself since logic is almost always progressive in the form of A begets B begets C.
So you’d rather have shitty abusive heterosexual parents over good gay parents, because that’s exactly what your comment implies. You didn’t say “shitty parents shouldn’t be allowed” but “same sex parents shouldn’t be”.
In any case this is the best analogy I’ve heard on the subject:
“Gays have fought for and won the right to board the sinking Titanic and drown with it.”
And that’s before getting into domestic violence in Lesbian relationships, which is not sunshine and rainbows either
"The scope of domestic violence among lesbian relationships displays the pattern of intimidation, coercion, terrorism, or violence that achieves enhanced power and control for the perpetrator over her partner.[4] The forms of domestic violence in lesbian relationships include physical abuse such as hitting, choking, using weapons, or restraining; emotional abuse such as, lies, neglect, and degradation; intimidation threats such as harming the victim or their family, or pets; sexual abuse such as forcing sex or refusing safe sex; destruction of property such as vandalizing the home and damaging furniture and clothing, and personal objects; economic such as controlling the victim’s money and forcing financial dependence.[9] In addition, psychological abuse was found to be common among lesbian victims. Findings from studies have shown that slapping was most the commonly reported form of abuse, while beatings and assaults with weapons were less frequent.[3] Sexual violence within lesbian relationships was as high as 55%. The most frequent type included forced kissing, breast and genital fondling, and oral, anal, or vaginal penetration. 80% of victims reported psychological abuse and verbal abuse. For example, being called names, yelled at, and insulted."
What happens is that when a women abuses a man in the forms mentioned above, he usually takes it silently, but when a woman abuses another woman, she tends to report it to the police. There’s a lower threshold of what women consider as “too much”. So % wise most cases of reported violence are from lesbian relationships. This will also lead to more divorces now that they are legally married.
What all of this means is that lesbians have essentially fought for the right to give lawyers a lot of their hard earned money. Marriage to begin with was terrible in practice- A business contract that no sane person would sign if was in the proper context of a business contract, and not involving “feelings” and “love” and social pressure. Instead of boycotting the whole thing until it’s fixed (removing religion and state out of it), people are actually joining in.
They need to remove state and all benefits married people get over single people but thats about it.
Also yea shitty hetros should get to raise kids, gays no, unless they are at least biologically linked. If gays wanna have kids then one of these degenerates needs to take one for the team and go knock up/get knocked.
This loving gay family willing to take the poor downtroden orphan into their lovely home is nothing but pure fantasy hollywood horseshit. They big mean sonsabitches that are prone to abusive tendencies as anyone else, except when a kid has 2 moms he needs to survive the rag twice, or if 2 dads hes gonna grow up worst than fucking Kazuya. And even if the kid dodges all the worst bullets we can think up and grows up normal, still gonna grow up with a fucked up perspective of the world.
I say keep it simple, they want kids let but they need to have em first, and when they grow up to be super terrorists the parents shoulder the blame for all their bullshit.
It implies a comparison because that’s what bothered him enough to resort to the emotionally manipulative “think of the children” argument. Not shitty parents, but gay ones.