The displaylag.com test is more accurate.
The test of that monitor on TFT Central uses SMTT, a camera-based test that compares results with a CRT. The displaylag.com test uses a more accurate a Bodnar lag tester method.
Thanks a lot dude. 11ms is still not shabby.
I ordered a Eizo FG2421 today, which will replace my Dell u2312hm. The FG2421 is rated a bit higher in input lag, 11ms with Turbo off and 18ms with Turbo on vs the 9.3ms of my Dell. Reason I’m getting this new monitor is that I want to get rid of some screen tearing while v-sync is off and have more fluid motions overall. Will the potentially double input lag make a huge difference for SF4 or is 18ms still low enough for fighting games?
http://www.eizo.se/default.aspx?page=11&product=FG2421-BK
Thanks.
Edit: Actually I should just play it with turbo off either way, 120hz should be enough of an improvement against tearing and with low display lag.
Street Fighter is still a 60FPS/60Hz game so you’ll still get tearing on a 120hz monitor with vsync off and it won’t be any more fluid. Stuff you can get 120 FPS in will be great though.
There’s an option on PC to set it to 120hz, I would assume this is to remove tearing but ofc the game itself will still run at 60 frames?
I have an XL2420T, even running at 60 FPS while the monitor is set to 120hz will have tearing with vsync off.
No, and yes. The Foris is a great monitor, but the 120hz and 240hz turbo modes are designed to insert blank frames and eliminate ghosting, not to prevent screen tearing (which is due to the video card pushing out frames at a different rate than the screen is displaying). To quash that, you’d need an Asus VG248QE with the G-sync module.
http://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B004VRJ3KQ/ref=redir_mdp_mobile
I am having a hell of a time finding any tests or reviews for Samsung LN32D403
It’s an HDTV and from 2011 so chances are it has a lot of input lag. 
Not necessarily. You want to look at how much image post processing this TV has.
You know the rules Smashbro, when it comes to HD TV lag if you got to ask then Don’t.
Assume its High Lag and look else here. Try to go for a HIgh Rez PC monitor over a HD TV.
Post processing or not most can be turned off especially with Samsung HDTVS and still have close to or over 2 frames of input lag(And that’s ‘a lot’ to me)
From displaylags tests the best 32" has 26 ms and that’s a Samsung that also has ‘clear motion rate 60’
90% of HDTV is going to have at minimum 2 frames of lag. I have only seen one and it was a Sony that has a single frame.
That particular TV is going to be pretty barebones when it comes to image processing since it’s only 720p. It probably has minimal picture controls as well. It’s most likely a perfectly playable TV.
^ The recent sony w802 and w950 series are measured 17ms roughly 1 frame.
Anyone with a LG PB6900 Plasma share their experience in input lag?
Just re-posting this here in case it might help anyone looking for a monitor:
Is this the best option? http://www.amazon.com/dp/B00GWFNMJS/?tag=dislag-20
According to the database, it has 10ms. I wish I could get a bigger screen, but according to the database, there’s no monitor bigger then 27 with sub 1 frame lag :(.
You have to make compromises dude. You either get a big screen and accept some lag, or get a small one with less lag. Or get a CRT and deal with the bulky size.
There is no perfect solution at the moment. Hopefully in the future that will change.
Yup, I have a 55" 2014 model Bravia I bought specifically due to low input latency and I can’t tell the difference between it and my monitor from a gameplay perspective. So I get near the performance of the tournament level montiors, the aesthetics and quality of a Sony TV, and an outstanding picture and smart TV OS. Not a bad compromise.
I was going for a sony big one too, but it has 17ms. Since 1 frame = 16,7 ms, it would be a frame late. If only it was 16 ms :((((. We gotta test more monitors to improva the list. Maybe there’s a big and fast monitor.
I’m confused on how less than 1ms matters. Being OK with 16.7ms but not 17ms is pretty arbitrary. BTW, the EVO monitor is 10ms so it’s over half a frame late and is considered the standard. AKA you will never notice the difference between the Bravia and the EVO monitor.
However, if you can find a large TV with lower input latency then by all means share. Nothing beats the KDL-55W950B for new TV’s that has been documented.
One review of many,
Sony W7 and W8 series are king when it comes to big screens and input lag