I don’t know what ot think of this.
Either the 3 seperate games are reasonably priced…or there will be alot more missions than SC.
Ah, not a bad gouging strategy there.
Since lots of people will buy it for multiplayer, it forces them to buy the game three times because they still want the completeness of getting the trilogy!
Nah.
If people want MP, they will pick and choose one.
Highly doubt they will chop up the MP experience in all three. If they did, that would be stupid.
I really hope they aren’t planning on charging $50 for all of them.
I just saw this on kotaku.
Ridiculously fucking bad idea.
I was really really hyped for SC2, and this is just extremely dissapointing. I like the multiplayer more than singleplayer, but that doesn’t change the fact that i want to get a complete game instead of 1/2 a game.
SC2 needs Single player for each race and multiplayer.
I like this idea as long as the other games aren’t too expensive ($20-30?) and the first one has the full multiplayer experience. Wouldn’t hurt if the other two games had Brood War type content to it too. If there really is going to be a very long delay of the game for Blizzard to complete the other two, then I would rather take this.
Terran campaign is supposed to have like 26 missions or something lol.
But it’s all about the multiplayerrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr.
(also fuck yeah savior)
I wouldn’t mind paying $50 for all of them…I’d rather not pay $30 or more for each of them if they have minimal content.
As far as MP…if they allow all 3 races for play within one campaign that would kind of defeat the purpose of releasing 3 seperate games.
i don’t know if i’m going to play this game. it will suck up a guaranteed 3 years of my life. i’m not in grade school any more :sad:
You need to learn time management, learn to limit yourself.
I know it’s difficult but do something like if playing SP then set an alarm clock and save and exit when time is up.
For multiplayer, limit yourself to a certain time limit and if you can’t then limit it to like one match per weekend.
Worse advice ever.
I’m actually kind of disappointed. Looks like they slowed the game down by a LOT.
I believe there are different speed options. (like the original game.)
Sorry, I actually meant it in more of a “damn, how many hits does it take to kill something now?” sort of way.
I’m not too happy about the news of a trilogy release. I’d rather wait a bit more and get like a game that’s so huge that my 60$ felt like a steal than to buy only a part of a game.
Because it was normal speed, it probably felt like things took many hits to die (a la WarCraft 3).
If Blizzard played StarCraft on Very Fast, then it’d be hard for them to show off all the cool abilities and effects of the units.
Me, too. I’d rather wait for a complete game that keeps my jizzing for months straight due to copious amounts of content.
it will be worth it.
For Bizzard’s sake it better be. If the game isn’t good, they are going to fall on their asses hard.
Well damn, that seems retarded in Blizzard’s part, UNLESS, each individual campaign is the same length of a full game. If they are all just regular sized campaigns then the following 2 better not be more then $30.