SRK Photographers Thread Vol. 1

^ i agree with everything he said.

if you are good with post processing, you might be able to get away with lesser gear. a nice lens can go a long way tho. i would suggest getting the latest and greatest by default and compromising from there. not everyone will use all the features a camera has. figure what you need from the camera the most and start eliminating what you dont need.

i used to do professional work (get paid for photography) with an entry level camera. a consumer wont be able to tell the difference most the time.

as far as the nikon vs canon stuff goes, its all preference. the camera bodies are laid out a little differently. nikon is more manual with knobs and dials while canon is more menu UI based. just a personal preference. im pretty familiar with canon, so i stuck with it. as far as lenses go, the general consensus that i get from other photographers is that canon makes really great prime lenses and good zoom lenses. nikon makes really great zoom lenses and good primes. it just depends how you want to use your equipment.

from personal experience, i think entry level canon is better than entry level nikon. higher end bodies, nikon sort of beats out canon a bit because of a few features but theyre both pretty comparable.

yea, megapixel count is a little over rated. the good thing about higher megapixels is that you can compress it more to give you clearer pictures, but thats about it. unless you plan on printing larger poster sized images, theres no reason for anything more than 10mp. also consider that the more megapixels you use, the bigger the file sizes are. an 8mp camera will take pictures that are about 4-6mb large. imaging trying to store all that. (i have 3 hard drives storing all my photos)

one thing i noticed about nikon is that they sort of over saturate images (colors are brighter by default). its not a good or bad thing. but it sort of fools noobs into thinking that nikon takes ā€œbetterā€ pictures. it doesnt matter if you shoot in RAW format.

i wonder if REI is still around. he knows way more than i do about this stuff. he would probably have some better advice about this.

Hay Guize! Long time no see! Quick update…

Haven’t been around the internet much in recent months because I’ve been knee deep in work. Last saturday was my last shoot for the spring. It was a corporate event thing where we did portraits for about 300 different families, and got a whole bunch of candid shots of everyone attending the event so that the company could use the images for their quarterly reports, newsletters and web stuff. The 40D that I got last september died during the shoot. =’/ 40,000 clicks, and the mirror assembly went out. Using a 20D in its place until I get it back from canon.

Now I’m going to take a break because my wife is a few weeks away from having our second child.

As for advice on the gear for someone getting started, I would say get the entry level kit of whatever camera brand one of your friends has. That way, they can show you how to use it, and you can possibly borrow lenses/flashes and learn what you want and don’t want.

Truth is that the difference between pro and entry level gear isn’t going to matter in the majority of situations that you find yourself. For the most part you are talking about two things when you are comparing an entry level kit to a ā€œproā€ setup. Ease of use and performance at the limits of the camera. Ease of use is things like dedicated buttons, joysticks and wheels for changing settings instead of a menu system on a LCD screen, or how much dust/wind/water/abuse the thing can take. Performance at the limits of equipment is stuff like how much noise in the shadows (or at higher ISO) that you can see, which one crushes blacks first, if the channels clip all at the same time, or what kind of flare and ghosting happens, and how the OOF fall off is rendered. If this paragraph meant nothing to you, buy entry level, shoot and be happy.

If you are interested in the differences, here are a couple of shots (out-takes from an engagement shoot). The first is a 17-40/4L on a 40D, and the second is the 17-85 on a 30D.

Obviously, the overwhelming majority of the images you can’t tell which one is which. But, when you are pointing the camera towards the sun on the horizon, and the water is a giant reflector, the L vignettes less, maintains proper color and contrast and has less cromab, has less color-shift and resists flaring so that the image is still sharp.

It is these differences that don’t matter until the equipment is at its limits that you are paying for, and frankly, unless you are getting paid to get images, missing a shot here and there doesn’t matter enough to buy the nicer stuff, because the real talent is in the composition.

Anyway, less talk about gear… here are some recent pics I took of my son.

Some amazing work in this thread

holy shit!
thread has been moved here
will post some good stuff in here soon

I agree. A lot of nice work. Here’s a little something from a shoot I did with a local model.

http://www.jeanattesalazar.com/x/DSC_0275-Version2.jpg

I loved the concert photography that was posted, too. I shoot a ton of shows a few years back. I truly miss it now.

Hey guys I was wondering if it would be ok to talk about video photography in here too? I just ordered a Sanyo Xacti HD2000a from amazon and along with it a wide angle and telephoto lens. Now, Im still not quite sure what a telephoto lens does, but will it help me add depth between my subject and the background? Kind of like this? (I realize that this is a much more bad-ass camera than the one I got, but still)
[media=youtube]p4uX1O6vrLQ[/media]

Or is that some type of Macro lens/setting?

Heres a cool macro setting video of the camera I ordered.
[media=youtube]6MOoBvNd-1k[/media]

Some shots I took about a week ago with my new DSLR. It’s my first one, so I’m trying to learn the lens, and the whole camera itself. Nikon D3000 for anybody who wants to know. Living where I do there isn’t much to take pictures of, unfortunately.

Also, what are your thoughts about dragging photos into a photo editor to boost sharpness and blur the background? Is that a bad thing to do, or is it recommended? I’ve talked to photographers who swear by doing that, saying that ā€œwhatever makes the photo look better is worth doingā€, and some say it’s not worth doing because you’re just being lazy at that point.

Thoughts?

If you’re considering the 17-55 f2.8 IS then get the 7d instead of the 5d II. The 17-55 has an EF-S lens mount, so it won’t work on a full frame sensor, but your 35 f2 and nifty fifty will work on all EOS DSLR bodies, full frame, crop, 1.3, etc.

The 17-55 f2.8 IS from what I’ve read is one of the best EF-S mount lenses and very close to L quality without being in the L line. I haven’t used it myself because I shoot full frame. How does it perform indoors in concert light? well that can be answered even without having ever used the lens, just based on how wide it’s aperture is. 2.8 is very good for low light situations, one of the top choices for wedding photography is the 70-200 F2.8L IS, and wedding light can be very low.

Your 50 1.8 will perform better in low light than the 17-55 f2.8 IS, because it is 1 and 1/3 stop faster, it’s also light as a feather, as you know. So basically, when you said you had to shoot at iso 3200 with the nifty, with the 17-55 you’d have to up that iso to 6400 or 8000… or wherever you shoot iso 800 with the nifty, you’d have to shoot at iso 1600 or 2000. That’s some crazy high iso for most camera bodies.

So if you shoot concert ALOT, I would highly suggest the 5d II over the 7d without question, if you’re shooting Canon. And I’d also suggest against getting the 17-55 anyway, because you have a 35 and 50 prime, I would actually suggest an 85 prime next to be honest. Unless you’re against switching out lenses all the time and would opt for zooms.

This IS my first post in this thread though, so you can pretty much take what I’m explaining and suggesting with a grain of salt. However, I’ll tell you that if you were to try all of these things out yourself, you’ll see that what I’m saying has merit.

I don’t have any pictures to upload for you guys right now, I’m sorry. But currently I’m shooting with:

5d II w/grip, 50 f1.8, 85 f1.8, 70-200 f4L
D40, kit lens, 55-200 IS

They’re both right. Anything that makes a photo look better is worth doing, however it does make you lazy if you’re opting to do things you can get straight out of the camera without post processing yet. The thing about post processing is that it’s most of the time, destructive, meaning the initial image quality of your photos are going further down the more you do.

To make your background blur, shoot with a wider aperture, and focus on the subject. What settings do you shoot your camera in? Auto? Manual? P? A? S?

All of you guys got some dope photos though, I don’t want to critique cause I don’t even feel it’s my place seeing as though I’ve not posted a single thing up myself.

I love photography though guys, I’ve had this thread subscribed for over a year, but I haven’t been onto SRK for so long so I haven’t even looked. I jumped from graphic design to this a few years ago and haven’t looked back, I think it’s my calling.

Went to Tahoe for the first time. Here are a few photos.

Images link to Flickr version.

Canon 7D / 35L

http://images18.fotki.com/v270/photos/3/1649693/8610493/_MG_1852-vi.jpg
http://images36.fotki.com/v1180/photos/3/1649693/8610493/_MG_1865-vi.jpg

http://images17.fotki.com/v523/photos/3/1649693/8610493/_MG_1977-vi.jpg

http://images116.fotki.com/v1596/photos/3/1649693/8610493/_MG_1981-vi.jpg

http://images56.fotki.com/v1599/photos/3/1649693/8610493/_MG_1984-vi.jpg
http://images17.fotki.com/v523/photos/3/1649693/8610493/_MG_2011-vi.jpg

Auto a lot of times, but I’ve recently been using the non-flash setting, which I’m pretty sure is just auto with forced flash off. I just recently got a book on the Nikon D3000, so I’ll look into that wider aperture and see how that works. As for focusing, I’m just setting it to manual so I can use the lens how I want to, gives me more control, and, IMO manual is easier to use than auto focusing on the D3000.

^ it also depends on relevance of distance of you, your subject, and your background. the closer you are to your subject, the more extreme the ā€œblurā€ will be. of course aperture makes a load of difference too. the wider (low f#) the aperture, the more effect it has on the background/foreground.

i would suggest shooting in one of the less auto modes (manual, Av, Tv). you can use P mode if you want, but its still automatically doing things for you. and if you have auto-ISO, turn it off. you will learn faster if you had fewer things automated. when i first picked up a DSLR, i had it on manual the whole time till i recognize the equation to properly expose.

Some great shots the lake. Captured the color perfectly. I’ll have to take my kids there again this year. You should visit Lake Shasta too if you haven’t yet. Same gorgeous color.

I see. There’s pros and cons using Auto. A pro is that you won’t spend time adjusting the camera, you just shoot, flat out. No more fixing the camera and missing a shot.

However… the biggest con to that is that you have no control, so basically you’re putting your trust into the camera doing everything for you:

I mean, I guess that’s not really a problem, because it’s about the photographer and not the camera. If your composition is appealing, and an engaging photo is created then it doesn’t matter. The problem though is that, the cameras make decisions that make zero sense most of the time. For example, back lighting the subject you’re photographing, and the camera will screw up the exposure alot of the times. Where you’d get things such as the background being completely blown out or the subject is totally underexposed, so it becomes a silhouette of your subject when that might not have been your actual intent.

If it looked good though? Doesn’t matter. But it won’t come at a consistency and there was complete lack of control. Putting your hands into the cameras fate.

Also, on auto the camera chooses your ISO setting to try and compensate for certain exposures, so depending on your camera it could choose a high iso that isn’t very good for your camera body, giving your very noisy images with unappealing digital grain.

Or the camera will pick a shutter speed that would result in blurry images, this you’ll find, might happen quite often if you’re shooting in full auto without using a flash, and with using a slow lens. Or the camera decides, that out in direct sunlight, that it will shoot with a very small aperture and ruin the depth of field you wanted in your resulting images.

Auto also picks the white balance, you take a picture of a friend and now their skin looks as if they were a zombie, instead of a normal flesh tone, because the camera didn’t compensate for tungsten or something.

Thanks. Shasta is definitely in the itinerary. :tup:

Hey guys, wanted to share my photostream/sets on Flickr! Check it out!

As far as my favorite photoshoot this year has been, check out some of these red carpet shoot for a LOST event in Hawaii:

More artsy though, I recently did some ā€œlight paintingā€:

Enjoy!

When did you shoot with Jessica? She’s definitely a fun girl. I love the vibrant color in your sets. Definitely makes your work stand out.

Thank you! I shot with Jessica in late may, she’s definitely an awesome model.

Thanks for the compliment about the color, it’s something I always strive for, I love vibrant colors. :slight_smile:

I finally figured out how to properly link images!

These are some of my recent favorites :slight_smile:

http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4047/4651393749_94e3de18c3.jpg

http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4029/4672548230_01c6d4e6f9.jpg

http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4009/4678328243_2aeccee5b5.jpg

I ran through some financial difficulties and had to pawn off alot of my equipment slash strobes. Although here are some of my shots

nikon f80 Ilford 3200 28mm f/2

p20 bowes strobe’s

d300 tokina 11-16

canon 20d 10-22

man I miss my cameras. I’m 2 paychecks from being of debt though :slight_smile: