Who has asked for more help than anyone and when I ask them directly who they will vote for, they still don’t know and wait until damn near the last second to just vote majority?
SAD
I already said “wut r we doing guys?” is a stupid post you’re trying to say I did, but someone has been doing that and it damn sure isn’t me, so if you want to suspect someone for that reason, why haven’t you suspected SAD who is doing exactly that?
You know in the game thread you give a reason. This explanation you just posted that is the truth, you are supposed to keep in your Mafia PM, that reason here, you only voted to make sure AC wasn’t lynched. Mixed those 2 places up huh?
Clearly bandwagon player, for some people they don’t think you’re clearly a wallflower. Combine Wallflower and Bandwagon and that’s a problem.
He followed every page, to chime in 1 liners, never sees votes, didn’t care that Chief made a list of all votes + postulated on who the rest of the voters would vote for, which left SAD’s own name out. He wasn’t going to point that out about himself to be a part of the OZ voter group early and contribute to Chief’s tallies, or even provide what his vote at all for the 3 pages thru the page Chief posted the list, until the very last second?
This post: I asked him about Oerba and OZ for the day. He only answered about Oerba, with an “I don’t know, maybe he is, I wasn’t watching him and don’t know why you guys came out of nowhere on him”
He didn’t talk about OZ at all and voted at the end of the deadline.
So we have a SAD and Oerba connection now. I know Oerba is getting all the lynch votes today, so we don’t need to vote SAD today when it won’t be good to have a divide and possible bad outcomes. But your time is limited now, SAD. You voting for Oerba at the last second won’t help this time.
Yeah the next time the bandwagon comes you don’t want to be traced back to being the one who started it like you did with Aidebit, who wanted to vote sovi3t.
You always ignore when people wanted to vote for the two big targets (like Oerba and OZ) and never discuss their reasons why they want to vote for either of them too?
So it takes a long time to ask you way into the next day phase why you voted for them, where you’re hoping that we don’t ask you. Your locked vote in the thread is always just a courtesy, survival method, when it shouldn’t be and you should be in the group of wallflowers to be checked or dealt with.
Nice insight there Fuzz. This is the only thing stopping me from starting a wagon on you. You make good contributions but your absence has been an eye opener. I know life is first but that excuse gets too many people off the hook and in not buying it.
@HAX - It is literally impossible to respond to you. You say some bullshit then 13 posts later you correct yourself. WTF (dubumm tss!)
Maybe Cynt and BM forgot they were in this game. On my phone so it’s hard to go back to prior pages right now, so I’m just going to ask: RF and SAD, did you really just vote to lynch Pie? If so, is it really because of that simple comment, or is there more to it? If you didn’t vote, what do you think of Pie?
If anything, players like Cynt, Hecatom, and GR are using this debate between WAH and SAD to hide away and stay out of the spotlight. Chief is usually pretty active; unless I missed something he’s voted me and vanished. BM…man I don’t know about him even, I don’t know where his posts are. Skizzz has defaulted to being the post boy to be relevant, although he’s new so I give him benefit of the doubt. I’d love to agree with Solvo3t to kill all wallflowers, but that would kill me too lol.
If the Arena game is anything to go by I wouldn’t count Skizzz out because he’s new. After that medicine play he did I wouldn’t be surpriced if he as vigi would hand over his gun to a random mafia and somehow the mafia would end up dead.
@Oerba, I’m here, but I’ve been distracted by Titanfall. Playing the beta. The game is sick.
No excuses for me though. When I’m absent you can still be damn sure I still know what’s going on. I promise.
Right now, I see a lot of weird crap. The pie votes included. It always seems weird to me that people would bote for a random person that has no chance of being lynched on the current phase. I’m really hoping those aren’t locked.
And please tell me these rage lynches ain’t serious. Last thing we need are random lynches without reasoning to back them up. (If you do have some legit shit on Pie then share it)
No, I didn’t lock it. I’m considering it, but to actually get him lynched I’d need to go back through the thread again. That is to say, I think he’s dirty, but I don’t have much evidence.
-His behavior is much different
-But he told us he was changing his playstyle
-He’s contributing much less than usual (coming from me that’s rich, I know)
-But he told us he was changing his playstyle
-He’s not following a logical argument when he wanted to suspect me just because MP’s LG said that I was suspicious
-But he told us he was changing his playstyle
That’s another reason I’m mad at him, the “I’m going to be trying something new this game” strategy is such an obnoxious catch-all for suspicious behavior.
then respond for once about SAD, about Sovi3t. Did you learn anything from Aidebit? Do you care that Godots is a wallflower role, whether civ role or MAFIA which is a role too you know.
Fuzz, SAD said he changed his playstyle without telling anybody
& when looking up those posts I came across his big reason for having pietastic as his #1 suspect, even during 3SL/AC and OZ/Oerba. SAD said because, pietastic has changed and is posting less.
He never wanted any help to get lynch votes for pietastic either. Instead of 3SL, after AC’s big drop, only 1 page later: “I don’t know, I only want to vote piestastic, unless things change in the next 12 hours…”