Eh. I’m still waiting to cop that uncensored version of Wolf of Wall Street (Who in the fuck just cuts out 20 min worth of scenes from a movie and think it’s a good idea? Fuck you Moral Police :mad:
Forgot the other parenthesis :mad:
No. I’m lynching him because of that first-class certificate, because we don’t have another suspect AND just because.
Correct. Publicly stating your voting choice is considered good behaviour as it allows civilians to examine your motivations both in terms of choosing to support you as well as once that person is dead.
Bandwagoning is the process of voting for a popular choice without providing your own explanation for the choice.
Didn’t say you did.
In the DR game you tried to lynch CK and probably would’ve had MP not screwed up early. I blew you up after that. Vampire game you got Jones lynched day 1 and Fuzz lynched you after. You have a history of trying to push day one lynches as Mafia. If it came down to you or Fuzz I’d rather it be you due to your actions (plus you went right for him at pregame right after we got roles.)
I had no idea this already started, but after looking at the thread, there’s nothing going on anyway.
Time to get my logical fallacy chart out.
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/45366695/Logic/The%20Texas%20Sharpshooter.jpg
Well done on ignoring the past three or so games where I’ve been Civ and pushed for Fuzz’s lynch Day 1 though.
Two actually, and you flaked in the first one.
Besides, you didn’t push for it as hard as Vynce the second time. First time was basically “Lol lynch Fuzz.”
Why don’t we discuss lynching some of our notorious wallflower players instead?
Good evening, all.
If that’s how you want to interpret my vote, fine. Let’s see how you interpret my Day 1 Fuzz Lynch in the next 5 or so games.
Either way, I’ll leave it up to everyone else to decide whether you have a case or not. If they believe you in thinking that lynching Fuzz Day 1 is Mafia behaviour, then there’ll be nothing I can do to defend myself.
I agree with Syn and would rather go for someone that appears to be wallflowering than lynching Fuzz day one unless he slips up (doesn’t seem likely to happen during day one but you never know).
I never got to see how Fuzz plays the game last time and I would rather kill someone that might not contribute to the civilians cause and doesn’t say much than someone who enjoys the game. This only applies for day one though and if Fuzz start to look mafia-ish I’ll vote for him.
Besides there’s plenty of time so it’s unnecessary to jump the gun on Fuzz already.
And yes I know half of that was appeal to emotion but whatevs
Damn I’ve been slacking, will catch up today.
Have been playing ST at next level since like 2PM EST and got home like an hour ago lol damn I missed a lot already.
Checking in. I’m sort of tired since I played around 8-10 hours of UMVC3 and have to go to work in 4 hours…zzz~
Oh right, been meaning to ask you this, actually, ask all of you this, who do you deem a wallflower? I mean, it’s day one, so yeah, that’s a hard question to answer, but if you feel that a player is really a wallflower, then you’ll tell them that D1.
I think SAD is wallflowering, but then again, it’s SAD. He won the last two games because of his wallflower-ish nature.
Even though you were only doing this contractually, you still get a reward.
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/45366695/mp's%20award.png
Looks like Alpha’s gonna have to wait all night to get lucky.
Unfortunately for him I’m still not really convinced one way or the other in terms of who we’re gonna lynch.
… Fuck, now I’m wondering if there’s some sort of Schizophrenic role given we have a newcomer.