When’s this phase end, 5 minutes? Got home shortly ago and haven’t finished reading the thread yet.
@Fuzz - 24 hours or so.
You are not the center of the universe, Chief.
Sovi3t continue to embarrass yourself in front of us, no one is paying attentuion to you anyways. MP you’re usually a decent player why suspect me? I hope you have something substantial to indict me with beyond lies and slander like sovi3t
Anyways I stand by my earlier suspicion that there is some…I don’t know link between bious, AC, and/or RF. So if we vote 1 of them I propose we vote for all 3, and I don’t think I’m ready to vote for any of those 3 yet as a hunch is not a good reason to lynch someone even in this phase of the game.
I think I’m going to be voting MP tonight because he has dodged not 1 but 2 of my posts questioning him on his reasoning, and on top of that I happen to be one of his suspects after pressing him hmmm yeah whether or not you’re mafia MP you’re certainly not looking too good right now and I suspect you may be leaning on your “big name” advantage to afford you the ability of dodging my questioning.
Good, I don’t have to No Lynch again cause I was behind on the thread :lol:
Going out of town Thursday morning (like 4 AM) until Friday night, so I’ll be playing catchup a lot of Saturday and Sunday.
No I’m not… but for the sake of mafia, I’m more likely to be killed off before you. =]
That makes me feel important. That said, I’ll scratch you off the list now.
Mega breakdown of all of 3SL’s posts. The ones in spoilers are inconsequential.
Even with all that time off, you’ve still managed to contribute less than nothing, as I will demonstrate.
Translation: I’m going to let everyone else do the work for me.
[details=Spoiler]
If I was nitpicking, which I am, I’d say you’re bringing your post count up.[/details]
Wait, you’d be more suspicious of the plan if you were going to be lynched earlier? Shouldn’t your suspicion of the plan be the same regardless of which order everyone gets lynched? This sounds like a slip.
[details=Spoiler]
You haven’t posted anything consequential except for that bit about pietastic’s plan.[/details]
The thing that interests me in this part is your reasoning behind pietastic. You basically go in a loop saying that you suspect him and you don’t suspect him at the same time. Trying to keep your hands clean?
[details=Spoiler]
Nobody understands what HAX refers to.[/details]
[details=Spoiler]
That reminds me, he didn’t even end up locking his vote in for Fluff. @Aidebit, your award is suspended and you’re a faget.[/details]
Translation: I’m more than happy to bandwagon.
One of a couple of posts where you try to buddy up to Bious. We’ll find more as we progress.
[details=Spoiler]
Fluff.[/details]
How would one less Mafia member affect their Night 1 behaviour?
[details=Spoiler]
Again, irrelevant to what I’m trying to prove here.[/details]
I would suggest that you were trying to force a tie vote, but that’d be illogical to force a tie vote between two Civs if you were Mafia. The only assumption I can make here is that you wanted No Lynch Day 1, Aidebit Lynch Day 2 and Alpha Lynch Day 3, buying everyone on your team 3 days instead of 2.
Now here’s the big one. The post that EVERYONE should’ve jumped on you for saying, instead of just going ‘lol wut do u mean’. Here are the scenarios that I can come up with to follow your reasoning.
You’re Mafia and I’m Civ: You know the exact amount of Mafia in the game, because you are one. You assume that I asked kaz or something in order to find out this information and think it’s common knowledge, despite the fact that it isn’t. Everyone else knows I was just using 5 for the example. Most logical conclusion for me to come to.
You’re Mafia and I’m Mafia: Everybody pretty much forgot that you’d even made this post and you’d dropped off everyone’s radar except mine. There would be no reason for me to bring it up again and throw you under the bus at this point. Illogical.
You’re Civ and I’m Mafia: If you believed I was Mafia and had let slip the number of Mafioso in this game, why wouldn’t you take more action than ‘i’ll lynch alpha if bias is’? If I were Mafia and you were Civ, then you’d believe that I’d slipped up and you would’ve gone hard on me. Illogical.
You’re Civ and I’m Civ: Pretty much the same as above. You’d still believe that I was Mafia, yet you didn’t do anything about it. Illogical.
Translation: Somebody else please make the accusation for me so that it doesn’t look bad on me when he turns up Civ.
You make it sound like MP is one of your prime targets, but this is the first time that you bring up MP. Another one of those ‘push the blame onto someone else’ posts.
Because it specifically mentions that I used the number 5 as an example. You chose to ignore that fact in all your posts.
Not ONCE did you tag me or even direct a question my way, and I’ve got all your posts above to prove that fact. Translation: Look guys, I’m contributing! No, don’t look. I promise I am!
Giving the new guy advice to be as useless as he can? That sure is helping the Civ cause! Also there’s a part about you being wrong underneath that.
Not sure whether to file this under ‘Sucking up to Bias’ or ‘Getting an extra Civ killed’.
[details=Spoiler]
Fluff with no follow-up.[/details]
[details=Spoiler]
That’s not what sarcasm is, but I digress.[/details]
Final post. Almost identical to a post MP (Mafia) made about me (Civ) in the Resident Evil game. Used to belittle someone’s logic, make themselves appear clean and push attention towards that player.
Before doing this analysis, I was pretty sure on 3SL based on the ‘5 Mafia’ post and the last post, but I’ve definitely found some interesting posts to solidify my suspicions, especially that part where you pretend to have an opinion of pietastic.
Conclusion: Lynch: 3rdSTRikeLOVE
*… I just have to respond to this. Coco, there was no wagon forming on you. It was literally just me and MP that noted that you were playing differently this game, by no means was it enough for you to roleclaim. The mafia won’t kill you at night, you probably won’t get lynched for a while (if at all) and even if the UC investigates you we won’t be able to know if you’re telling the truth since the godfather is at large. You’ve really tied our hands here.
Is anyone willing to help me keep track of who HASN’T posted during this day phase? My guess is that if the mafia does have a silencer they would’ve used the ability on someone last night. *
Hey Chief. Nice to see you. So… you been watching the Olympics? The curling is really amazing this year, ain’t it?
@DG - HAX is the first name that comes to mind.
Curling is off the chain. Has it started yet? Been waiting to catch that one.
I can have an exact answer pretty soon for you when I start tallying up the post counts for today, but off the top of my head only recessiontime, oerba and cynt haven’t posted
I’ve presented the reasons why SAD and MP should be the next to go, now has anyone besides AC presented a more compelling argument for anyone else? Or are we ignoring other people’s opinions and just going on our own wilfully ignorant way this time?
*I forgot those 3 were even in this game. The two names that popped up in my mind were Pietastic and Hax. Thanks for the help Skiz. *
*Nevermind, looks like Hax did post during this phase. *
I think I’ll put SAD on the backburner for now as AC has convinced me that 3SL is a good lynch candidate, that being said AC’s breakdown of 3SL looks a lot more impressive than it really is, 3SL never really said anything truly self incriminating, just a bunch of fluff posts and 1 questionable one, but on day2 that’s probably as good a reason as we’re likely to get outside of someone pulling a Bulldancer 
MP should be on everyone’s radar until he answers my questions.
Hey, give me a little credit here.
This post makes me wanna lynch you for being a bitch, but thankfully your post on Third plus who I’ve seen rush a vote on you has brought some questions up.
Still, you are a bitch.
Lynch AlphaCommando
pie had a couple of posts near the bottom of page 13 as well