SRK Mafia VII: Ultimate Marvel vs. Capcom 3 Edition - APOCALYPSE (GAME OVER)

Fudd could have a role and may be just trying to seem less suspicious… Although that is a major misplay on his part.

I still say we should lynch inactive because it’s either a choice between someone not here or a shitty player, but if everyone actually posts I’d want to hear him speak before we decide anything.

:rofl:, you don’t want to make the same mistake of the last game, right?

never again. Dramatix is always Mafia

why not? the whole point of the game is to filter out who’s a civilian and who’s not. I personally don’t believe he’s a civilian, but hey that’s me.Something about him/her… Does that answer your question?

I also believe that we should be more invested on the people who are so “gun ho” on voting on the inactives . Easy escape goats~
Those are the people who either have a special role or are mafia.

You’re gonna have to give me a better reason than just because. Did he say something that seemed suspicious to you?

Lmao, Ben. :rofl:

Honestly, it seems like dealing with inactives first is a tricky affair. Getting them out of the way quickly will help us get to the meat of the game, but at the same time we don’t wanna collectively shoot ourselves in the foot.

It does buy us time as a rather safe option to weed out each other’s tendencies without resorting to a no lynch or something like that though, so it may be for the best. For now, at least.

I say keep the inactives in the reserve. We can throw wild, have a 50% chance of taking down a Capcom guy, and still have the numbers if we guess wrong.

DRD people, yall saw how much he hurt the civs with his faggotass graphs, with twice the number of players he’ll just be that much more damaging.

PW makes a good point too though, so yeah I’m down with lynching either Fudd or DRD, not like we have much to go on day0 lol.

Him saying that does bring suspicion because even as a noob to the game you see other people at least checking in. In that same boat of logic though I would suspect Orochizoolander moreso. Why?

  • His excuse for not posting was I fell asleep when I was going to post.
    He has played a couple of games so he knows that the noose comes hard and fast on inactives yet he fell asleep and then was logged on for an hour or two(maybe more) before he posted. I also find it hard as hell to believe that you would fall asleep when reading these roles when any normal persons first thought would be WTF is up with these roles.

  • In his other games he usually responds in the thread pretty quickly. Last game he responded saying that there could be good mind games with the roles we had but this time nothing after reading them.

  • Even if his argument is it took so long to post in here because he was reading the posts. None of them actually have that much information to go on so you dont need two hours plus to post. It more likely takes much more time to post in here if you are sending messages trying to come up with a strategy.

Now if we are to do as Pimp Willy says it seems to me that Orochizoolander would be the most logical. Am I supposed to overlook these things just because he wrote a whole bunch compared to Fudd? I dont think so.

With that being said I still think we should lynch inactives.

Icege has not been on in 11 days so I think he will just be dead weight and is actually who I think everyone should vote on if we are doing inactives.

Great Cow Lord’s previous comment may have decided my vote.

You don’t know how much i have been laughing at my office today due all the stuff that he posted on the old thread :rofl:

I think the whole point is that we really have nothing to go on. Claiming people are mafia on day one with no info, is just shady as hell.

Orochi backing up other people who are voting to lynch people seems like such a weird tactic this early in the game. I can’t believe I have to start having a list ready, with names already on it, on day one

I don’t see it as tricky though, that’s the thing. Last game we voted an inactive first, and it turned out to be Mafia. So it’s a proven tactic. And all the people who didn’t vote an inactive last few games, ended up being either n00b or mafia. There is always that chance that we might hit a civ, but the same happens if we start throwing out suspect lists on day one with no info, and go from there.

When is the deadline to cast our votes? Noon tomorrow?

^ Some people actually have a job faggot. Also if you want to lynch me okay I can’t really defend myself because as I said the first few days its a guessing game, but if I’m lynched everyone will be looking at you next.
I admit i’d be fucking pissed of i got lynched first lol, especially since in every single mafia game i’ve proven myself as an MVP regardless of which side im on i take this shit seriously (teh intwrwebz). That’s how it is for anyone, you point a finger and come up wrong its your ass next, just like how if I’m wrong about DRD go ahead lynch me for it, if PW is wrong about Fudd lynch him too.

Also I agree with the lynching in actives but PW is right, the inactive are usually civs but are an easy choice for the early game so it’s whatever to me.

judging by skied it’s post he’s more likely just a dumbass civ than mafia.

Sikwidit^* fuckin ipad autocorrect

Did you even read the post?
I said if we do what Pimp Willy said then suspicion would fall on you. I did not say to lynch you, everything I said was based on your actions and why that would bring suspicion.

You have a job?
You went to sleep after posting in a thread last night like 2:00 AM or something, this thread was up before 12 AM by the way. You are off for about 9 or so hours(presumably sleeping) then logged on and did not post for a long time. You really cant argue that that does not seem suspicious. I dont remember you doing much last game. Maybe I have a bad memory.

Stop talking about last game.
Also stop acting stupid, that’s how you got murdered last game.

I can talk about whatever I want dumbass, also it’s interesting you tell me to not talk about previous games yet you ignored everyone else who has referred to previous games. Try contributing to a game for once, instead of saying generic false statements.

PW may very well be mafia trying to start a band wagon which is why I said if Fudd was lynched at any point PW should be looked at wit dem shifty eyes. However, the first day is always random and you know it, so what do any of us have to go on? Like I said lynching a civ early on is more valuable info than a no lynch. And yes I’m logged on SRK whether on my work pc, my ipad, or from home most of the time like most SRK’ers. Every SRK mafia game (this is what my 4th or 5th?) I’ve been right about who’s who more often than not and I haven’t been scared to take hard line positions rather than pussying out and hedging bets which is what quite a few players do unfortunately.

I’m still voting DRD, because like I said even if he is civ he is potentially more harmful to us than mafia and I highly doubt anyone can come up with a better rationale to lynch anyone else than that on day 0.

I tried to be proactive but realized the error of my ways. You can insinuate whatever, but I know I was in the right given my circumstances of speed reading the thread, and did right in rectifying my statement later.

And you are now a target. That sounded way too desperate for a civ.

Is Fudd a new player? If so, you’re right, he’s very unlikely to make that kind of bluff, and would be deadweight for either side.

But still, you’re running the risk of decreasing our numbers. Which obviously, every decision we make runs that risk, but this looks like a coinflip to me that may be difficult to take. If he’s a civ, he’ll probably still at least vote, so I don’t know.

This.

Here’s my suspect list at this point (in order of priority that I think lynching them would be a good idea, not counting in any inactives):

great cow lord
Hecatom
Fudd
Pimp Willy (only slightly, because I can see his point, but it still doesn’t seem like a good reason to me to rush to lynch him)