Haha thanks dude, I’ll probably switch it out again occasionally, but I don’t know, just felt like using it again.
This was my very first, Shion was second.
kaz, I hate Tekken as much as the next guy, but you’re horribly misinformed.
Serious question, why don’t alot of people like Tekken?
It’s not like it’s a new series or anything, which is liked least? Tekken, or VF?
VF is both liked and respected. Even some top players will admit that the mind play possible in that game is pretty sophisticated. You won’t find many scrubs playing it, that’s for sure.
I don’t give a fuck, because VF5 > both of them. And I don’t play Capcom games like that.
[media=youtube]ySmxfsfKTL0[/media]
This is Tekken now.
I dont own a printer.
Rare footage of a Manx tournament comback. And bonus me walking behind Mr. Ben Weeks. :tup:
[media=youtube]iP1yjThGey8[/media]
Early Marvel 2 was the shit! And yes, bonus points for remembering Apex points on SRK. :tup:
Comparing Tekken to SC is apples to oranges. That’s like trying to put say MvC2 is better than CvS2. They’re both way different and way good.
“now it’s time to fuk!”
[media=youtube]XO-qtoA1WIk[/media]
(Stupid face and its refusal to be rid of its facial hair easily.)
Geez, I have even more history books that I thought I did. They must account for at least like an eight of the hundreds of book that I have. Hmmm…actually probably a quarter since I haven’t counter whats on the closet shelves yet. Ugh.
Well, that’s even less reason to go to Atlanta, meaning I’m currently have -8 reasons to go there now.
I guess the (creepy) sentiment is “appreciated” despite the fact that you’re one of way too many people who are far more concerned about my having sex than I am. This even though I also a) would never pay for sex for various reasons and b) wouldn’t have sex with strangers.
Well, yes, hence why I was asking you to clarify. I rarely argue semantics “just because”.
Right, I’m hanging on to “hope”–ha!–to prove myself right in the same post where I open up by saying that I’m content to agree to disagree and that I’m only really continuing to question your logic to try to get another prospective.
Of course.
Well, first of all, I find “fooling around” an idiotic phrase even as prudish as I am and as foolish as I thus think sex can often be.
“Semantics” out of the way, if we’re essentially talking about foreplay (right?), then off the top of my head, it’s a very limited list of what I’d considering always “foreplay” rather than “sexually ambiguous” (could or could not be “sex” and just isn’t something I haven’t entirely [bothered] to decide on) or “obviously” sex:
-
Kissing of the non-genital areas. (“Obvious” even though apparently like 2% of Americans consider deep kissing “sex”. Even I am not that prudish.)
-
Biting and licking of those same non-genital areas unless that would lead directly to orgasm and/or ejaculation. (So, say, biting and licking the nipples of someone whose nipples don’t really do “anything” for them would be foreplay, but doing the same thing to someone whose nipples are strongly “connected” to their genitals is at least sexually ambiguous, especially if they can “get off” just from that.)
-
Groping and fondling of non-genital areas. (Obviously, I’m not counting just touching genitalia as “sex”, but any sustained tactile contact of genitalia tends to turn into masturbation and groping & fondling count as sustained contact, so…)
-
Cuddling and hugging. (This does not include humping, which is at least sexually ambiguous.)
-
Non-genital massage, especially a full-body massage that still disregards those areas. (Arguably this counts under “fondling”, but I consider massage as more purposeful than that. Hence, it is counted separately.)
That’s honestly it. Everything else is either sexually ambiguous (masturbating in front of each other, frottage/humping, BDSM, etc.) or “obviously” sex (oral sex, vaginal sex, anal sex, etc.) to me.
Not sure if that’s because I’m a prude or if that marks me as a prude. I don’t really care either way. Shrug.
For the exact same reason you spit out chicken skin. 
He won’t fuck fat white bitches, he won’t eat chicken skin and he won’t play MvC2. Worst nigga evah.
I never understood the appeal of MvC2 or 3. Unbalanced tiers, same 8 characters all the time, 45 second combos that you have to sit and watch, auto tech and rolls…
Its all dumb.
Couldn’t you just ask for a bowl of lettuce like any other rabbit?
I agree on Marvel 3, but Marvel 2 was some lolz. So much trolling with mid tiers in that game. They were viable, people just didn’t believe it. I played Blackheart and Gambit. Marrow. I played Sakura, even. :tup:
I’m not too sure about that.
Blackheart had an awesome AA and an infinite right?
I am proud to say I’ve never dry humped anyone as a teenager (or any age, prospective smartasses of The Lounge)
Shit is so lame.
I laughed in one of my friend’s faces when he told me he had phone sex before.
Yes
Love
I was mad too.
Unbalanced tiers is kind of a misinterpretation of the game. You didn’t play characters, you played teams and there were plenty of viable teams. Problem is that people think that just because they can’t take Ryu all the way then the game somehow suddenly sucks. People see one or two matches of Yipes, Soo or Wong beasting and suddenly think the entire game is like that. Its like watching Yun or Makoto go HAM for two rounds and then saying the game sucks; that shit is dumb.
Everyone had an infinite in that game, but Blackheart’s was too hard for me to pull off. I honoestly just used him for his assist and doing unblockables with the demons. People would fall for stupid shit all the time and eat standing RH demon trap > super. :tup: