Your initial reply didn’t address his argument. If you are gonna call people dumb you more or less have to reply properly. Otherwise its two idiots being dumb at each other.
And so you responded (twice now) not understanding either mine or Dagon’s post. Had nothing to do with procuring or not procuring. Had everything to do with “if it’s easy, they’ll more likely procure it without trouble, OD, and get the fuck out of our gene pool”, instead of hanging on to a thread, causing everyone around them to suffer at the cost of their addiction, and of course, spawning unwanted and possibly handicapped children en masse. The easy access just speeds the “gtfo of our gene pool” idea along instead of it taking YEARS if you’re lucky.
Oh I know, it’ll still be difficult for 'em. But it’ll take time for them to get to that level of “can’t get the dough and the supply” funds if it were legal (easy to find, cheaper to purchase), which just allows for many many more opportunities of OD. Once they hit that barrier, it becomes that much harder to fuck up and OD. I know it’s not realistic, but fuck, let me dream.
I know exactly what you’re trying to say. That’s how i know you’re a moron. There isn’t a crackhead alive sitting around going “durr, gee, I sure do wonder where I could find some crack.” They know where the fucking crack is. If crackheads didn’t know where to find crack, they wouldn’t fucking be crackheads. The don’t break into shit because they can’t find the crack. They break into shit because they are broke and desperate for a hit. They need money so they can buy crack. If crack becomes legal, guess what? THEY’RE STILL FUCKING BROKE AND DESPERATE. Nothing changes, except that the expenses of regulating and probably taxing crack sales would likely make it even MORE expensive. To summarize: euthanize yourself.
Also, you get to ride the retarded train if you think my reply didn’t address his stupid-ass argument. Legality has NOTHING to do with why crackheads do what they do. Legalizing it doesn’t mean making it free.
Haven’t you ever read or seen Matilda? They make the fat kid eat cake until he is sick. Clearly, if you are found guilty of drug crimes they should be like “YOU WANT DRUGS!? YOU WANT DRUGS!? I’LL GIVE YOU DRUGS!!!” then inject lsd straight into their eyes and have a group of clowns assault them.
Killed by a group of clowns, they thought they saw.
Tyrone Biggums is the patron saint of crack heads. He’ll acquire deity-ship as soon as he and Tyrina discover a way to fashion a pipe large enough to smoke the holy rock that they won on Fear Factor. All hail his twitchyfulness, Lord and Father of the Red Balls. :tup:
Bet that once I publish my Pen & Paper RPG, I won’t release an April’s Fool edition (at an exorbitantly high markup price) that includes both him and Hentaimon, God of Weabos and Creeps and a few other gods that I’ve thought up, in a parody of D20 Modern. 
Reminds me that AKON is this weekend, but I’m not sure if I wanna go or not.
See, you’re still talking about step B (post-life destruction addiction) when I’m saying watch 'em burn at step A (pre-life destruction addiction). Two totally different things. My point is to watch 'em burn long before that desperation happens. The legalization would make that step A last that much longer due to the cost decrease and ease of access. Not to mention that if they ever get to that level, the amount they have to go through to continue would be VASTLY less considering the shit wouldn’t cost as much.
DEATH TO ALL CRACKHEADS!!!
That thought made me look up Bin Laden, and his death pictures looks like M. Bison after a real bad ass whoopin…
Wow, what is wrong with me?:bluu:
Holy crap, you are stupid. What cost decrease? In what universe is the shit not going to cost as much because it’s legal?
I would mention how crack addiction is a social symptom more than the problem itself and how legalizing it could produce a whole different demographic of crack addicts, but you are clearly not intellectually equipped for that discussion.
Legalizing it though just might stop them from putting holes in gas tanks to sell gas for crack money.
That should be the immediate goal.
How? How is legalizing it going to change the fact that a broke crack addict is still broke and addicted to crack, and thereby liable to do anything to get the money so he can acquire more crack?
You think that dealers sell this shit wholesale to their addicts? Fuck no. That shit’s sold at a premium partly because they simply can, partly because of the legality. Dealer’s takin’ a risk by even supplying it. By legalizing, you get a cost decrease through simple competition, ease of creation, and the overall lack of risk with the law. This is common sense. Do you not understand how the black market works? At all?
I fully understand the social implications, which is exactly why I still don’t think it should be legal (or any physically addicting substance that causes life-threatening withdrawals, including a couple that are currently legal), but once again, of the arguments for legalization (which was what I originally stated), that’s easily the biggest one: the idea that people will more than likely weed themselves out if they are stupid enough to start doing it at a level to cause an addiction.
The idea of the license to parent, though. That I’m behind. I coupled it with the whole legalization thing 'cause of the most problematic social implications, the worst offender IMO is the idea of children born into that life.
You guys don’t even know a crack addict stole his gas in the first place.
WAKE UP FROM THIS DREAM YOUR BODY IS MAKING YOU BELIEVE YOU ARE IN.
No, we need to go deeper.
I think we ought make crack legal, and readily available at 7-11s everywhere. Hell, why not at Starbucks while we are at it? That way, when destitute addicts need a quick fix, they can rob 7-11 and Starbucks, killing Muslims and hipsters both, whilst getting themselves arrested and incarcerated, thereby supporting the prison industry, and fulfilling a three-point agenda of ignorant redneck American culture.
@Cynt: This post is sarcasm.
That means it is not to be read as it is written i.e. not literally.
Sent from my HTC Thunderbolt using SRK Technology.
Liked, and pic quoted, because she is incredibly fucking hot.
Sent from my HTC Thunderbolt using SRK Technology.
You just keep topping yourself. Crack is the Top Ramen of the drug world. Its entire reason for existence, and the reason it is so popular, is because it’s cheap to produce and can be sold at more accessible price points, providing greater availability to its primary demographic: the poor. there already is competition, among dealers and suppliers. When it gets legalized and there are a handful of corporate entities handling it, when the cost of government regulation gets figured in, when taxes are added on top, do you seriously think the price is going down? You are suggesting solving a problem that doesn’t exist, short of giving everybody free crack.
(I can’t believe you’re being serious about this, Cyntalan. I’m not going to get involved beyond that.)
Hmmm…I’m trying to think what specific news story is more annoying at this point: the “zombie” attack, John Edwards’ “trial” (which ended in a mistrial, how surprising) or, on a more local level, Sierra Lamar still missing or this Ross Murkarimi bullshit.
Kinda leaning towards the missing (white[-ish]) girl.
That would certainly make the “War on Drugs” more effective.
Then again, there’s very little that could be done at this point that would make the “War on Drugs” even less effective than it already is.
Reported. No single image or single word posts. We are trying to make GD better.