Contrary to belief of 3rd Strike greats such as Mopreme, I beg to differ.
“Lucky” parrying is not always a bad idea. If you don’t do any lucky parries and play completely technically the whole time, you are not going to always win. The consistency of this style of play is ironically its downfall. If you do try doing this shit in Austin, you are getting randomly parried into low forward xx SA3 alllll day by Ken, and losing. It works well for Mopreme, his game is very refined, and he has good patterns. Despite all this, he’ll still lose to Hsien if Hsien plays well.
What you have to consider with parrying is the risk-reward ratio. If I am fighting Remy or Akuma and I’m playing Makoto SAII, I have no shame in guessing parries on my side of the screen all day. If I get just one, I win the match. If I miss one, I eat a 20-25% combo at worst. If you have the life to spare, why not? Are you going to play “technically perfect” the whole time, only using parries on reaction and red parries (if that)? I’m not. I will try once or twice to parry a jump-in and hit them with a 100% combo. If I guess wrong, I get thrown. Oh well.
Obviously, this is a more extreme example, but random parries can sometimes be in your favor depending on the situation. It’s a judgement call. It keeps your opponent worried. If you land a random parry into combo, your opponent has to completely reevaluate his or her strategy for the remainder of the round. There are MANY attack patterns I can use against Mopreme that I CANNOT use against other Einstein’s players often or at all because of the high risk of getting parried.
Given this, I strongly believe that parries are good, even if it was just a lucky guess. It depends on many factors–lifebars, what round, how predictable opponent is, etc. Parries definitely shouldn’t be “ruled out” as always a bad thing to do in a match.
fubarduck