Whatever happened to no religious threads on SRK.
It’s the same shit recycled EVERY day damn near.
No wonder the man wants to shut us down.
You know that I wasn’t referring to only males, that makes no sense at all. And you’ve sidetracked from the debate into plain insults. So mature.
now you are proving my point, you are just intolerant of other people believes that you have to be an agressive cunt to try to prove your points
keep it up bro, you are doing a great job
im not going to keep wasting my time with someone who is not capable to have an inteligent discussion without needing to attack others only because their believes are different from their own, you are exactly equal to those stupid fundamentalist, you try to impose your view on others and resort to attack and insult others instead of using dialogue.
btw, why didnt you addressed my other post that answered your previous quote of one of my posts?
Oh my goodness, gracious… :shake:
They can’t say otherwise. It’s a fact.
what debate? You have no proof for creationism. A debate consists of two arguments backed by facts, not several logical fallacies, all backed by a book that can’t even be referenced or traced concrete.
You say evolution is false because it hasn’t happened over in the past 500 years when humans started taking real notes on their environment. You refuse to accept that micro evolution leads to macro evolution over time. You haven’t made a backable claim as to how life was created, you make claims that it was just created.
what’s mature about your debate? If you provide a single point that’s rational then I would engage but you haven’t. I already told you this twice. stop using circular reasoning and avoiding the issue.
I don’t think agnostic is a religious stance. I didn’t even say that. I was only saying that it wasn’t ONLY religious people who have a problem with aspects of evolution. Certain agnostic individuals do have issues with evolution. So your argument there is completely disregarded. You’re the embodiment of what is wrong with uneducated individuals (I am not assuming how much education you have attended. I am assuming how much you’ve actually absorbed, which is apparently very little). You’re just SEEKING out a way to lash out. You’re looking for a way to prove your intellectual merit, and this forum provides you with a false opportunity.
Your reading comprehension must be incredibly poor. I clearly said they were “romantic observations”. They were not meant to be taken as an argument for creationism. They were simply questions that I presented.
I thought Asians were supposed to be smart, what happened? Oh right, Christianity.
Having issues is not the same as dismissing it because a 5000 year old book says so. Just throwing that out there.
This is a little too delicious to be true.
“The issue for biologists is whether there is any sense in having the special termmacroevolution.[21]The answer is yes for a few biologists who proposed one or more evolutionary mechanisms which worked above the species level. The ideas ofpunctuated equilibriumandspecies selectionwere suggested, but in each case most biologists felt they could be explained by the usual small-scale changes. This explains why ‘macroevolution’ is perhaps a term biologists do not need to use.
When discussing the topic, creationists use “strategically elastic” definitions of micro- and macroevolution.[9] Macroevolution, by their definition, cannot be attained. Any observed evolutionary change is described by them as being "just microevolution”
Confirmed troll?
Vaccinations are proven. Evolution is not.
Try harder.
I AGREE for Pete’s sake. I am not backing creationists who use religious texts to disprove evolution. I can say I am 100% not okay with that. Did I ever try to do that myself? If I did, I was mistaken. Was simply defending the generalization of any one group in that statement. That’s all.
I don’t see why having to update vaccines isn’t an example of evolution. The virus and/or bacteria evolves, so a new vaccine must be made. Very simple, yes?
i have to say that it baffles me that with so much evidence of evolution, like that we share a lot of common traits ith other mammals, not only primates, but all the other species; that all of the life on earth use the same structure as building block, and that all of it is based on carbon that there is still doubt about it
Micro-evolution? Yes. Macro? No.
But its still called evolution, yes? Does it still function like evolution, is it still evolution, yes?
Does it invoke absolute proof for macroevolution? No.
If anything, if macroevolution exists, we should be a stronger, better, smarter species by now, yes?
Take a look at the world and people around you.
Oh my goodness… If it looks like duck, acts like a duck, and quakes like a duck, then it’s a fucking duck.
So you would support the claim that birds didn’t evolve from land dinosaurs. Despite having extremely similar bone structures, and scales? Yeah, they totally didn’t discover a Velociraptor in Mongolia that had feathers…