SFV wants to SELL THE FGC to the masses. Will it be worth a barebones release?

[Projectjustice]

My PC runs it better than yours.

[reh]

A good matchmaking system should keep you from getting your ass handed to every single match. It should eventually match you with people who are just as bad if it’s done right.

Survival mode IS a vs CPU mode so that’s good enough for giving someone new something to do in single player. One March hits and the daily challenges and such come about, that’ll give more multiplayer based things for people to achieve that aren’t so set around winning but rather learning.

Honest question: Is the matchmaking good? Don’t own the game so far (damn studies ;_; ) but I can’t say I had good experiences in general.
Would be nice to have a decent matchmaking… in… like any game.

I still don’t get how you can’t not include a super simple versus mode, I don’t get it. Can’t even think of any game like sports, RTS, fighting game, whatever, without one. Games you play 99% vs. human opponents. Just playing vs. the AI with normal conditions. Some people like it, some don’t care about it, but normally it’s just a staple and I’d give it priority over something like survival. Well, survival has the color unlock attached to it, so it’s kinda important…

And no, I personally don’t care about versus mode in SFV, but as mentioned I know some who do. :v

Still not sure if I like Capcom’s decision. Hopefully it’ll get better in the future but it’s quite the bumpy start.

[purbeast]

It’s pretty baffling that there are people in here trying to defend Capcom for not including an arcade mode or CPU vs mode. Then to make up excuses about how it’s just a multiplayer game blah blah blah.

I can get that many people don’t care about it, but to defend Capcom for not including something and not letting people know about it is just asinine.

I guess a lot of people here don’t realize that we make up probably .01% of the people who play SF games. The other 99.99% of people who are casuals don’t come here and don’t follow development of games like this. They see a new SF, remember playing it in the arcade, then go buy it. And just like every other possible iteration of SF that came out before this game, I would expect an arcade mode of some sort where you can play 1v1 against the CPU in best 2 out of 3 rounds.

[itzpookiie]

My PC runs it better than yours.

rofl

It’s pretty baffling that there are people in here trying to defend Capcom for not including an arcade mode or CPU vs mode. Then to make up excuses about how it’s just a multiplayer game blah blah blah.

I can get that many people don’t care about it, but to defend Capcom for not including something and not letting people know about it is just asinine.

I guess a lot of people here don’t realize that we make up probably .01% of the people who play SF games. The other 99.99% of people who are casuals don’t come here and don’t follow development of games like this. They see a new SF, remember playing it in the arcade, then go buy it. And just like every other possible iteration of SF that came out before this game, I would expect an arcade mode of some sort where you can play 1v1 against the CPU in best 2 out of 3 rounds.

blind fanboys