Nah, 4 is good. Multiplayer at launch was basically a fixed version of reach, with some cod elements thrown in (that honestly didn’t work). They patched it and took out the CoD elements, so now it’s a fixed version of reach and is really quite good.
H4 campaign is solid too. Not as open as 1, 3, or reach. But bigger in scope than 2.
Overall, I think I might agree that H4 is the weakest halo… but it’s still better than 90% of other shooters.
H5 cranked up movement a lot. The people who don’t like 5 typically think it went too far.
5 is my favorite for 4v4. While it’s maps are not “artistically” the best, the layouts are ace, and the gameplay is the best in the series.
It also has the best firefight mode.
Campaign is only solid, and BTB is probably the weakest in the series.
The new CoD is good. I’m enjoying it, I haven’t enjoyed a CoD game since Modern Warfare 3. There are some shit maps on this new CoD though. The map with the bridge is truly awful. Overall the game is good. It could do with less campers but meh, wotyda gonna do?
Did anyone play Crysis? I played them on consoles and loved the multiplayer. Absolutely loved it. I can imagine it being frustrating for people because if you were new or not very good you’d get stomped. I probably was responsible for quite a lot of people quitting the game due to being massacred.
AvP on 360 was also really fun too. Its the same as Crysis though, you would just stomp people if they were new or turd.
Guy was gonna seal Bison’s ass so we didn’t have to hear all that gay shit from @Daemos but he saved bum ass Rose so now we gotta deal with constant + pressure.