Well, anyway I’ve been thinking a lot of this to myself, espcially since G3Evolution has got a little more competitive and is developing a Mississauga scene, why do people get sick of seeing the same high tier teams winning all the time? This goes back to the Domination 101 topic on scrubs and playing to win.
People get respect when they use other people away from the usual top tiers, but does respect get you victory? Not all the time. A very simple example would be in 3S, in a field of 16 competitors there a 8 Chun-Li’s and 7 Yun’s. This is a little extreme, but think for a second. There is one more player, a Remy, perhaps. Sure people will go, FINALLY, something different from Genei-Jin and Houyoku Sen. But, why do we see so many Chun-Li’s and Yun’s in the finals? Because they win. Is it really a crime to go with the best odds to win?
I bring this up now, because, more recently, in KOF XI, I find myself using Kula, Gato and Momoko. Momoko aside, Kula and Gato are the cream of the crop in XI. That would make me a scrub and no different from other “tier whores”. But, hey, their shit is hard to stop. As with all top tiers. Now before I continue to rant, which I don’t want to do, my question is:
Is it variety that matters, or the level of play?
(As, I always seen many people complain: Too many Sion’s and V-Akiha in MBAC, too many Mr. Big/Hotaru in NGBC, too many Kula’s in XI, too many Yun’s and Chun-Li’s, too much MSP and Cable - even I hate Cable and Magneto.) I could go on and on. Anyhow, tier spammage, is it bad? Not necessarily. Although, I do admit games do get dull, when the same stuff keeps happening over and over. Whatever it takes to win, I guess.
If I don’t stop now, I’ll keep going. No flames, please.