Dude you need to get away from that Balrog-Guile tag team Red Riding Hood hentai sex comedy.
**
*HERETIC!!! *
YOU WILL PAY FOR YOUR DISGUSTING ENJOYMENT OF PLEASURES!**
**
DO NOT BRING GUILE INTO THIS! HE WAS AN UPSTANDING MEMBER OF SOCIETY UNTIL THAT EVIL PEDOPHILE, BALROG DECIDED TO INCREASE THE GLOBAL DEMAND FOR CHILD ABUSE AND TWISTED HIS MIND! PEDOPHILES ARE NOT BORN! PEDOPHILIA IS A CHOICE SIMPLIFIED BY RUDIMENTARY ECONOMIC TERMS! **:mad:
You need to see Street Fucker my friend.
For some reason you and others think pedophilia is something that can exist in a vacuum and not effect anything else in life. You’re under the impression that pedophiles are just average joes like you and me but with a different sexuality. That’s not the case at all. Almost always, pedophilia is a result of severe childhood sexual trauma (99%+), not something genetic you are born with like gay people. As a result, pedophilia is only one of several mental disorders these people have.
The sexual interest in children is also something you can’t compare to a normal sexuality (straight, gay). A lot of their attraction towards children is because they are easy, weak, vulnerable targets that are easily manipulated. It’s in their very nature to prey on children, not just for sexual purposes but also because they have a drive to prey on easy victims. Even when these people voluntarily go to therapy, they have almost always already victimized a kid or two (whether caught or not).
These aren’t normal people with an unusual sexuality, they are severely mentally disturbed freaks that love preying on the weak and vulnerable.
Angry Liberal was trolling hard The SRK PA can still eat a dick.
Bitch please I don’t even main Balrog. I main Guile while lurking in the shadows.
Let’s get that shit straight about what character stalking a little girl on her way to grandma’s house she goes I main, plzkthx.
couple things, spudly being a retard like always’ check. angry spreading thought through knowledge like usual’ check. first of, aint you gay angry? i know that neither of us will fuck belluci, but i didnt realize you where bi (oftopic).
first what i cant stand about the dutch. you get caught trafficking a couple 100 k’s and youll be doing 3 to 5 years. add the fine for tax evasion. you fuck a kid, your out within a fucking year. dutch law protecting the dutch man, fucking sic.
the usual pedo here is generally middle class to rich white dutch males. child molestation does happen here once in a while, but its rare (probably the poorer ones). most pedos here are the same as US pedos. meaning they’ll take a plane and fuck some asian/indian kids out in the east where they’re safe®. fucking asian hoe’s is one thing, but fucking lil asian boys is just sick.
part 2 (ps3 cant make longer posts).
something ive always wondered, most pedos here are generally white western europeans. pedos, like homos & animalfuckers can be from any race. is a larger percentage of western europeans pedo, or do some other countries keep their pedos in check instead of protecting them? playing judge yourself is frowned upon, bet i can guarantee almost any Turk will pick up his gun and kill the raper of his child instead of turning the guy in. note that im not condoning this, but id do the same.
a pedo is a pedo, but imo theres a huge difference between pedos that support the scene and watching kiddy porn (which is already sick imo, cause that kid is already fucked, even if you aint the one fucking), and actually taking that step and fucking a kid. or fucking the kid and making vids of it.
Funny thing. Once upon a time it was, and was considered right up there with pedophilia in how sick and wrong it is. And even today, depending on your location, it can be considered socially unacceptable and people WILL hide it from anyone and everyone, get married, have kids, and die of old age holding that secret. Not saying by any means that society will ever come to accept pedophilia (and to think I’m insinuating otherwise would be rather dumb), but legality had nothing to do with the point in question: whether people are guaranteed to act on their desires, regardless of the implications. To believe all pedophiles are also child molesters, have been child molesters, or will eventually be child molesters is ignorant as fuck.
Here’s the thing, they want to legalize child porn, that’s child abuse and endangerment. These fucks need to get castrated.
ephebophile is still a pedophile.
back for 2 seconds, then toward + :p:
all charge characters are pedophiles.
I sometimes click View Post if I think someone I have on Ignore has said something worthwhile or ridicule-worthy.
And you quoting “fact” is appropriate.
Dr. B yadda yadda yadda Community Chest his way out of Cosmic Monopoly Prison.
I’ll look forward for those videos:tup:
It seems like you are focusing on obvious cases of 50 year old men handing out candy to 10 year old kids. In which case I would definitely agree with you. But My problem lies in the black and white legal definition of what an adult and child is. Where i come from an adult is someone 18+, and a child is someone 17 and under.
This means if I showed an 20 year old guy a picture of a hot girl with huge titties, in skimpy clothes and in a sexy pose, he would most likley agree she was hot. But then when i told him she was 17. It is suddenly revieled that He is a pedofile. He is an adult that is sexually attracted to a minor. SHould this person be locked up because of this new information? is h a ticking time bomb for RAEP. i dont believe so anyway
Ephebophilia is completely different from pedophilia. Being attracted to post-pubescent teenagers is actually normal biologically since they are fully developed. However pedophilia is being specifically attracted pre-pubescent children.
One can easily argue the legal age of consent is arbitrary, but with pedo’s it’s not so arbitrary since puberty is defined.
I’m not agreeing with the people thinking we should lock up pedo’s if they haven’t done anything, but I’d keep a damn close eye on them.
angrylib doesnt/didnt know wtf he was talking about.
:rolleyes:
Dr. B always explains why he opposes a reasonable argument.