even if the knife has Goldman and Brown’s DNA on it, it doesn’t mean it’s absolute evidence that OJ did it. there has to be OJ’s DNA on it as well or some other evidence without doubt to connect him to the knife. also, as far as the article explained, he cannot be retried for the same crime and it would have to be some kind of civil liberties violation which would be easy to get around.
This argument about double jeopardy is a perfect example of people thinking they know better. Just spend 2 minutes on Wikipedia and you’ll find your answer in the first paragraph.
[details=Spoiler]The Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution provides: “[N]or shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb . . . .”[1] The four essential protections included are prohibitions against, for the same offense:
retrial after an acquittal;
retrial after a conviction;
retrial after certain mistrials; and
multiple punishment[/details]
My favorite scene in Naked 33 1/3 was the ending…Holy shit i was waiting for that look he gave to Frank when the black baby came out haha…He never gave that look that’s why i feel OJ is innocent. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nzv8ICrMY28
i went to a catholic school and they brought us all into the auditorium. I had no fucking clue wtf this trial was about, i was probably in 4th or 5th grade as well. this school was grades k-8…in hindsight…this is a fucking weird ass decision to make for us to watch this.