http://img411.imageshack.us/img411/7068/zyzz1.jpg
They’re trying to prevent the reincarnation of Zyzz.
Everybody getting killed over looks. Smdh.
It really isn’t a scene. It really is a God damned arms race.
GFY Fall Out Boy.
On the real, pretty crappy reason for death.
I wish they infracted you for posting that picture
It’s like they’re professional dirty cops
That first link puts the number at 14. Why is it that you like the daily mail so much?
guys guys, its not religions fault, its the believers for twisting the word of god!!!
cause you know, its not like the desert dogma religions aren’t violent pieces of literature written by ignorant violent pieces of shit sheep fuckers centuries ago…
NSFW?
And people gripe at me when I suggest the simplest solution: nuke the entire region off the map. Want to be completely incompatible with the rest of the world? Fine. Goodbye. Maybe in 50 years when we need the land, it’ll be ready to repopulate.
Ah hells naw!!! We let you take over, you’ll have random people humping everything in their house. I’ve got a ton of sharp objects and a spider.
…You know, I don’t give a fuck about that spider. Do it.
-Starhammer-
And nothing of value was lost
I’d try to refute it, but I know our arguments end up petty and going nowhere on this subject matter.
Ultimately I know well the war nature of books like Numbers and Joshua in the Bible, but I don’t believe the Bible is centered solely around that. So I say agree to disagree, move on, because I find myself agreeing with you far too often to engage in a back and forth in this matter.
What will you do about the nutjobs the idiot brits let in? There’s tons over there, in their “no-go” enclaves/ghettos.
If that’s your brilliant solution for dealing with the undesirable activities of human authority figures, we might as well nuke ourselves as well so we’ll stop sending our god damn soldiers all over the planet and keeping them there until they snap and massacre some random person’s entire family.
But that’s the point. We don’t need to be playing police all over the planet. We can’t afford it, for one.
Bring 'em all home, put 'em to work making sure our borders are secure, and if someone’s dumb enough to actually attack us, we go over, smash whoever the hell it was into the ground, and GTFO when we’re done, letting 'em rebuild on their own.
America not playing world police doesn’t seem possible.
Well to be fair the last time we said that we weren’t going to get involved in world affairs those asshats in Europe started another world war.
1: They’re just going to have to go back to help out pathetic foreign military cuz they can’t handle their own shit, and whose military is infiltrated by enemy loyalists and spies.
2: Can’t do that…for some reason, making sure people come here LEGALLY is wrong, and anyone who attempts that is evil, even though EVERY other nation has that right and in many cases brutally enforces it without reprimand.
We should all have the freedom to wear tight pants.
I challenge the veracity of this story. When I’ve been looking for other sources the only one I really recognize of the bat is the Washington post http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/asia_pacific/iraqi-youth-panicked-by-reports-of-killings/2012/03/11/gIQAW9pD6R_story.html That article doesn’t absolutely confirm any number of killings. Other “reports” state 14 killed. Is there any proof of 90 people being killed?
Yeah I’ve thought about this solution before as well, unfortunately there are a few problems with it.
The first is ethical. If in your ethical system, the ends fully justify the means, then where do you draw the line? Are you ok with killing one innocent person in order to slaughter 100 religious nutjobs? How about ten? How about thirty? How about people that fall somewhere in between religious fanatic and normal person just trying to live their life? How about all the babies? How about all the pregnant women? Personally, I don’t think its ever ok to kill one innocent person as collateral, no matter how many religious nutjobs you take out in the process. Otherwise, I’m no better off than the religious nutjobs I abhor.
The second is that your plan won’t work. Genocide only worked back in the day when pros like the Romans or the Mongolians could be thorough about it. The world is much more global today. Even if you nuke the entire middle east, surviving relatives in other countries will hate the USA even more and start plotting. Even if you magically assassinate all the surviving relatives, US relations will turn to complete shit. Allies will turn neutral, and neutral countries will be outright hostile. New terrorist organizations will be born, and they won’t be brown, so it will be much harder to racially profile them.
In conclusion, Richard Lionheart should’ve tried harder during the crusades. If he had forcefully converted the heathen, then the middle east would be a different place today, as christianity today is a tamer version than islam.