your right I don’t remember it much in Alpha 2, and I hated the MK series it accually made me drop fighting game for awhile so I never really knew much about it. But really in melee I got mocked and laughed at all the time for choosing Zelda. I flip flopped between her and marth alot. And on the tiers I wasn’t just talking about fighting games, stratagy games like Advance wars, heck you even see it on gun selection in Fps’s “what your not using the BR/sniper/rockets in Halo 2 your retarded”, or you only won cause you got rockets more times than us." its pretty much the same thing.
Still works, doesn’t the tiers change depending on the map in brawl, and plus most people expect you to be decent with all weapons unless perhaps in the case of the sniper so they expect you to always use the best gun(s) for the map, plus in many shooters there are weapons that are never considered good but some people like them, not many but some.
Let’s not derail the thread so post this in my fps thread and everyone there will tell you why you’re wrong.
Anyways is mk officially banned or whatever? most people who play brawl suck anyways and would lose to someone who uses a low tier character well then a scrubby mk (of which most mk players are.)
I’m pro-MK ban, but I’m not gonna get into that. Surprisingly, though, I agree with zoo on the FPS debate. I know for a fact that Halo 2 is one of the most balanced FPS games out there. I’ve landed kills with wayyyyyyyy too many weapons, even as a Halo 2 scrub, for the game to be BR/rockets/sniper only. My personal favorite is the plasma rifle. <3
I’m not surprised you would take that stance. Anyone who wants mk to be banned is a stupid scrub that sucks at brawl period. There’s a difference between the large majority of the cast not having any chance of beating mk and him having huge advantages over the cast and he is indisputably the latter raping only a few people.
Look at any matchup chart for st and you’ll see akuma has 9-1 or at worst 8-2 matchup against everyone that’s why he’s banned because no one has anything close to an even matchup with him and all tourneys became akuma mirrors. MK doesn’t even have as much of an advantage over the entire cast as chun/yun do in 3s and no one ever thought of banning them. There are several characters who have at least a slight advantage over him or at least have an even matchup and that fact alone should make anyone who wants him banned to STFU.
For as long as there are fighting games where there are at least 2 characters with different moves/styles there will be those who are better then the rest by a large margin and if you can’t handle that then the fighting game genre isn’t for you.
Seriously though if you think mk is overpowered to the point of warranting a ban then prove it, show up at evo next year and rape me with him.
Tourney results show differently, if mk was nearly as good as chun/yun how come there are plenty of people who pick other characters and place with them? If you can show me 99% of players in 99% of all tourneys picking mk then you would be right. Chun/yun make just about everyone else obsolete (at least in the US) and that is obviously not the case with mk.
You’re fat. This is clearly a valid argument against your point.
Back on topic, the reason MK isn’t “winning” tournies is because it’s good form to not pick him because whether or not you like to admit it he DOES have an advantage over all the cast. I just don’t think he should be banned because I’ve beaten plenty of MKs, even good ones.
Is this MK discussion appropriate for this thread? MK in All-Brawl is surely not supreme…
I wanted to ask Keits if 3 stock matches with 1 more minute of battle (4 minutes) would really have a considerable negative impact on the system, keeping aside the fact matches will be just a bit longer. I think it could be better. It’s worth a try. I still cannot enjoy rounds so short :wgrin: They need more substance :rolleyes:
No one has an issue with the round time but you. Keits put a great deal of effort into his decision to make the match length what it is. You have shown evidence of little to no such effort.
I couldn’t see how a 3-minute match would improve gameplay, turning each match into essentially a 1-and-a-half-stock fight. I understand that you guys have messed around and tested this stuff with Forward and other good players, but 3 minutes seems a little rich to me and it seems like the time limit could be exploited easily by the losing player to force sudden death.
There are other things, like MK and Pit’s ridiculous glide tosses, that come into play here.
