Since you are asian, which level of hell would that be?
it’s shit like this that makes it hard to take gay people seriously.
[media=youtube]neH6h0fXqlk[/media]
a lot easier to take seriously than true believers. Or African-Americans who continue to participate in a religion forced on them at the end of a whip by their slave masters.
[media=youtube]a54iqEr1flQ[/media]
I know, it’s almost as out there as gasp suggesting he was straight.
How exactly do you prove the sexuality of a man who’s been dead for centuries and hyped up into something he wasn’t?
I don’t think anyone should take his comments too seriously.
He’s basically trying to rationalize that being gay is okay as a Christian.
I am not a Christian and so this debate doesn’t really concern me.
The real question here is: Do Christians think homosexuals are doomed to hell?
But of course, we DO NOT need another heated debate on religion on the boards.
There is the statement of the thread.
They just keep doing shit to “shock the normals”, and making jokes of themselves (well, the men, anyway)…I really think people will start getting sick of them and their theatrics. More and more it seems they’re less about equality, and more about attention and validation. Shit’s getting old. Now an attempt to change the bible? Oh, boy…as if christians didn’t hate them enough already. While we’re on this…why do gay guys (sayyyy, Dan Savage) who have relationship advice columns in papers use the most vulgar language they can, unlike their hetero peers in the same line of work? The woman’s always right when they want to bring another man into a relationship, and if her boyfriend doesn’t want to do any m/m, the man is considered a selfish prude, and told to “try it, you might like it”. I think he likes teh “no homo” more than seeming like a narrow-minded dick in the eyes of gays everywhere, consider he ISN’T one.
yeah damn gays being so uppity, why don’t they know their place?
Elton John thinks everyone is gay.
I get this vibe too. They don’t have it NEARLY as bad as they make it out to be.
Do people really have trouble believing that at least one person in history can get by not boning anyone? I feel like some people have trouble accepting a historical figure that could actually suppress the hell out of their sexuality.
We’re talking about a religion who’s principle figure was born through immaculate conception. I’d say the idea that he’s gay is much more conceivable than that. Not that either of them have evidence… but seriously, who cares?
[media=youtube]tZMDxx3wxe0[/media]
“No! I happen to be gay and I happen to be very Catholic” C’mon! Knock it off! You’re just trying to make people mad.
[media=youtube]neH6h0fXqlk"[/media]
lol…jesus was a pimp…she was his number 1 hoe. she did work for the son of god.
i find all gay people are like this…all the gay people i know have the most messed up gaydar ever. i find straight people are more accurate in detecting undercover gays than gay people are.
look up like 11 posts dude
Stereotyping 101.
My one gay friend is a very straight-acting, cynical son of a bitch.
yup i am steriotyping…cuz all the gay people i know have broken gaydars and need them fixed.
actually dead people have no reputation so libel and slander don’t apply
Argh you fucker, I got my post set to like only so many per page so this is already on page 2. Fucking song is great…
Also fuck that Jesus shit, I worship the panther god niggas
considering the black church was the core behind the underground railroad, black suffrage, education and the civil rights movements it’s actually quite logical why some continue to participate in it.
considering the vast majority of people are straight it’s a pretty logical to assume that most historical figures were straight unless there’s evidence to the contrary in the same way it’s logical to assume a random stranger that you meet is right handed, like the vast majority of the rest of the population. but more to the point, most christians don’t think jesus was fucking or sexually attracted to anybody.