If you were a celebrity, would you still have unprotected sex?

That must have been one hell of a night. Hope you took photos.

Condoms are so gross…Put on a latex glove & lick the back of your hand…Now take off the glove & lick the back of your hand…Its like wearing a raincoat while trying to take a shower, its stupid.

We have a stud here.

Nah, it is a small group

I know you’ve gone bareback with many a random senator in the men’s room

I don’t know why you use homosexuality as a negative or why you aim it at me when I’m a sexual tyrannosaurus with the ladies, but okay. Whatever you have to say to sop up the tears.

Huh, i don’t think you are gay

I think you go gay for cocaine

There’s a difference

Depends on how much and the potency, tbh.

This thread… :lol:

I didn’t realize I had sex at all Kappa

@Preppy ban this man.

why would you rope me into this terrible thread

Because I want to know which option you’d choose.

u get banned for abstaining from sex around here? didn’t realize that was in the rules

I’ll explain my choice by way of my typical long and boring anecdote.

Last night my main squeeze put Rocket Science on. I did National Forensics League debate in high school and college and was fucking astounded at how good of a job they do at times of capturing how it all works/comes together. Debate tubs, the cadence, just the little things. Not intrusive into the movie where anybody cares, but still: fucking awesome that they were that faithful. The movie starts well and goes off the rails because, you know, indie movies.

I met some really smart people in the NFL. One of the smartest guys I’ve ever known, including working alongside some of the smartest people in the computer industry, alongside research and codec teams, people with multiple PhDs, was a guy named Todd from Oak Harbor. Todd lived with kid and a wife who didn’t love him at his parent’s house because while single he had fucked this fat despicable woman as a pity / “i haven’t had sex in a long time” fuck, knocked her up, and felt guilty enough to marry her. Our friend found her journals indicating that was her plan all along. So this super genius guy was a debate coach and just did not have a lot going on other than trying desperately to put food on the table for his family. I believe he was making some efforts towards breaking things off with her when he ended up having sex with her again and she got pregnant again. I believe she then got bored of him and started sleeping with somebody else and just … being the most terrible human being on the planet.

That’s just fucking Todd. That lazy ass woman just wanted somebody to have to take care of her. Todd had jack shit to his name, and yet that crazy ass took it all, ruined his life, and pissed away most of his future.

Wrap it before you tap it. If you’re serious about someone, give it a couple months, get tested - even that wait gives things time to get clarified - and then commit.

This is a cute subject, but not one I find particularly entertaining. I’m sure you’ve got friends who’ve had surprise kids they weren’t ready for. This is an avoidable fate. Avoid it.

This anecdote helps nobody. Have you seen the people in this thread? These motherfuckers are only getting married if the bitch is rich and proposes by giving them an MvC2 cab.

I wouldn’t be surprised if SRK was responsible by most of the single mothers in Atlanta. SRK dicking definitely is the Final Round of a heaux’s freedom.

Ridiculous… there’s no way in the world. I already don’t trust people (especially women) as it is now… as a celeb—hell naw x5000. She’s most likely going to be a drain on your financial situation for at least the next 18 years after that 1 night of stupidity. Nig please. It still surprises me that so many men out there… celebrity or not…are so stupid when it comes to this issue.

Yes, I do know how an IUD and nothing you posted was relevant to the point which is that the insertion method for an IUD is more intrusive than method proposed for this specific type of male BC.

Talking about more “intrusive” is even less relevant to what Reticently and I are talking about. Did we mention anything about how “intrusive” it is? It’s only later on did somebody mention how Vasagel is similar to non-invasive vasectomy. You were literaly arguing against a point that nobody was making.

By the way, that article is very biased. No opposing view? No mention of complications? Plus, the article says Vasagel is reversible, but doesn’t mention those results. Did the scientists not perform that other half of what they claim? That’s like watching Fox News and expect to be fully informed.