My bad just ignore the double post. Anyways I don’t get what the problem here is. Feminist ideologies just got exposed (has already happened hundreds of times already) so it’s just yet another example of their stupidity.
Feminists unique ability is to only see penises everywhere, they see so much penis they become lesbians because their body becomes a penis.
I once was reading through this text with a group of people, the text spoke of women highly but the feminist SOMEHOW found something in it to call it sexist. We explained to her slowly the context and meaning of the text and she feels a lot better now.
Needing to fund a study to find out if it’s sexist is a joke, they should be funding a study to find out the psychological competancy of self proclaimed feminists
thus it wont really settle anything
You’re a fucking tard if you don’t think the social sciences haven’t settle shit. Its whatever though, this is what gender studies and SJW do the rest of the field.
social sciences are priceless. the people in charge of social sciences are questionable though
The problem is that our crazies are really loud. It isn’t like the hard science hasn’t had them or still doesn’t, but the rest of the field does a better job at keeping their crazies in their place. Then we have the issue that almost all of our experiments are: 1) incredibly fucking cool but 2) incredibly fucking unethical. The stanford prison experiment made sure we didn’t get to do shit like that ever again.
Stupid ethics getting in the way of research.
Just wanted to post here before McRibs sends the kill order.
It’s not playing games that makes you sexist. It’s constantly beating women in games that makes you sexist.
Everyday women are humiliated and devastated in fair competition, of course men are going to develop a God complex.
This is pretty stupid. Feminism takes on all forms but at the core of feminism is the equality of all genders. It wasn’t even 50 years ago where women were considered the inferior sex through various laws in place, social hierarchy, and the pervasive thought in culture. It started because women wanted the same rights as men, and that’s a noble cause. Indeed, they should have them.
Any other perversion is not what feminism is about and anyone against the idea of feminism is in fact promoting a separate class of people where women make up the population.
Don’t respond to Sennin.
Didn’t know that’s who he was. Duly noted. Thanks.
One piece of evidence isn’t going to really help. Yes, we might have science on our side, even if it is just one study - but these people have never been about using science in the first place.
For God’s sake, we live in a world where anti-vaxxers is a real thing, and not just some long-running gag. It wouldn’t matter if we had 100 studies debunking the “games cause sexism” myth, all they’d need is one fraudulently conducted study that said otherwise and they’d cling to that one.
So yeah, games = 1, anti-gamers = 0, but we aren’t going to win this chess match when our opponent thinks we’re boxing.
The problem with this reasoning is that it’s the same justification feminist apologetics go to when confronted with the movements stupidity. A movement is only as good as its members and the actions committed in its name. It’s rather pointless to talk about it being a cause of"equality"when the movement has always been linked to extreme misdandry and giving women the same rights as men without any of the same obligations. It isn’t like the SCUM manifesto and Mary daly don’t exist. At the present time you have popular feminist outlets like Jezebel and feministing that actively promote misinformation and anti-male rhetoric, and likewise respected feminist like Jessica valentine and clementine Ford who literally say it’s ok if feminist hate men because misdandry doesn’t kill. Then you have the tumblr/twitter communities of feminist supporting killallmen hashtags and spreading erroneous feminist fallacies and lies like the wage gap,rape culture, the male gaze, male privilege and so on and so forth. Honestly just mention to a feminist that men are the primary victims of violent crimes, nearly half the victims of DV, the majority of the homeless, the majority killed on the job and just watch how much for "equality"they are when they tell you to stop derailing and mock you with sarcastic remarks like "what about the menz"and “not all men.”
The truth is that Anita’s brand of feminism is representative of the larger ideological zeitgeist that has informed the movement since its inception. Anita’s theories about patriarchy and her contention that misogyny is a pervasive societal ailment didn’t come from nowhere.
It is not surprising as I have never seen a gamer girl get turned away from any gaming event. We have a group of propagandists who are clearly spouting propaganda but any one tries to call them out on it they banned, doxxed or have their boss emailed. This is nothing more than online bullying, and I am kind of tired of sites bow down to a bunch of lunatics. Most of these members of this group work by getting patreon pity funded because they are women, then turn around and complain about sexism holding women back in the industry. This hypocrisy would be hilarious if it wasn’t so pathetic.
I didn’t wanna bother with this thread but since you asked me so nicely, let’s get this thread locked:
It parades about “equality” but with a false assumption that:
So if I have decided without any evidence that Jews as a demographic control everything via the illuminati and various conspiracies (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Protocols_of_the_Elders_of_Zion), I’m giving myself moral justification to treat them badly because I’m merely “punching up” and setting things straight, in the name of “equality”.
I’ll cherry pick like a mother fucker if needed and utilize plenty of false assumptions in the process, but my beloved modern religion taught me that the “greater good” justifies the means.
Examples of false assumptions:
- “Men, as a demographic, were always in power, at the expense of women.” This is false. 99% of men were not involved in decision making, that was saved for royalty and property owners, despite being sent to die in wars. Men as a demographic only got the right to vote a few years before women, and women did not need to register for any draft for this while men did.
- “When one man is in power, all men are in power, at the expense of women.” Contrary to actual reality where rulers fuck over other men. Stalin sent millions to die in camps. Male rulers don’t look after other men for being men.
- “Informal power does not exist.” Even though women had power throughout history to affect decision making because men in power catered to them, and still do. You claim women had 0 power before they got the vote?
This does not explain their powerful lobbying throughout history.
https://prohibition.osu.edu/womans-crusade-1873-74
https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=5JQWAAAAIBAJ&sjid=7CAEAAAAIBAJ&pg=6049,712919&dq=&hl=en
Bonus:
I don’t really care what you think about me. Examine the evidence and think on your own. People who feed you simplistic narratives count on you to be intellectually lazy and not fact check anything on a deeper level.
(This is not specifically directed at you, Raz0r. Forum posts are also directed at other people who happen to read them.)
I would have preferred an everything causes/cures cancer thread again, lol. Are these types of studies a thing now?
ofc i wouldnt paint the field with such a wide brush, but this is a good example of where social science falls short because you can’t really quantify ‘sexist attitudes’
This is why you need to look at the actual study and check their operational definition, because that’s what the study measures. Nothing more, nothing less. This is where most of the deception can be made. For example rape studies that for the sake of the specific study defines rape as X. They didn’t measure “rape”, but they measured X, and later went on to publish they results as if they are about “rape”. This was done by Mary Koss who redefined “rape” to exclude male victims and female perpetrators, and to inflate the number of female victims. This study was then used as reasoning to push various legislations as if there’s a rape epidemic on campuses worse than war torn Congo. And even Obama bought this horseshit without checking any facts. (Or maybe because it’s a convenient crusade to benefit him politically.)
We could if we weren’t at the forefront of dealing with tumblr horse shit. Some god damned thing happened that let unscientific dumbshit get spread around unchecked…I probably have to blame Franz Boas; which would be ironic since that dude was beyond dilligent in the way he took notes and processed the data.
there was a professor that applied to a position in my university. He was working on doing computer models of societies. He didn’t get the job. When I heard about it I was so hype and when I heard he got shot down the salt was REAL.