Execution is way better than TD
Obvious troll is obvious looks at Nissanzaxima’s post…I guess obvious to everyone else?
Also in the rare instance that de BLOO isn’t trolling and is just that stupid his post is akin to someone saying WW>ST, MVC1>2, CVS1>2, etc.
I’d imagine, I beat the game yesterday and decided to spent my free time today collecting all the cog tags and collectibles I missed. I took a break from that with one MP match. I always liked Execution the most in the past games, Once I really dive into it I’m sure I’ll exculsively play that.
Also, How am I trolling? The games play noticeably different. In Gears 1 the Lancer is dominating in top level play, I used to play in the MLG circuit for that game and our gamebattles team was top 5 in the leaderboards back in the day. Gears 2 had so many problems like the Lancer being COMPLETELY devastating to the point where the game felt like a shittier version of Rainbow Six Vegas. Then the gnasher was tweaked to all hell before they made it akin to Gears 1 again. The shield glitch that let you run around with an imaginary shield covering you(yo I used to play RAAM on locust so when I downed someone and did the shield execution it looked like I King Kong’d bitches since the shield was invisible, mad funny). Smoke grenades went from stunning you forever(and if you were on stairs you were double fucked since you’d have to go all the way to the bottom of them before your character got back up), to not stunning at all and fizzing out in 4 seconds. In gears 1 at least the smoke stayed around to help you make open areas safer to travel in, but in 2 they never bothered to at least make the smoke do that after taking away the stunning effect. Then there was moments in 2 where if you tried to get out of cover too quickly you’d stick to the wall. That game was just buggy as fuck.
Gears 3 is basically the real expansion we wanted after Gears 1. Though Ink grenades not lingering as long as they did in 2 is kinda lame and defeats the purpose of even using them. Other than that everything else feels fine. Maybe they’ll tweak the sawed off if it turns into a problem(you never know, sure only “noobs” use it because it gives them help, but top level people will turn “helpful” mechanics into abusive mechanics).
But the sawed off doesn’t seem that strong to really warrant a patch so far, imo.
ill be back on around 11 after always sunny and archer 
I wanna play some horde
I was doing really good with the gnasher for a bit but then went back to the so after “shotty” (lol) execution with the gnash…
Game is fuuun!
Boom Shot does Hella splash!
So much false information (sigh) where do I start. Saying lancer dominates G1 shows you either have horrible comp, don’t know how to play it yourself, or more likely some combo of both. I’ve played in many tournaments (mostly offline) and it’s a fact that shotty dominated that game because there is no hit stun so the best thing to do most of the time regardless of the map or situation is to run, rollup, and 1 shot people which is what made G1 mostly brain dead and unplayable competitively after awhile which is why it had a much shorter shelf life than G2.
Saying lancer in G2 was “devastating” is like I said indicative of you, your comp, and/or both lacking experience. G1 weapon damage across the board was inconsistent even after the last patch another reason why it’s MP is a joke however, in G2 not only is this fixed but thew weapons are pretty balanced it’s just the maps themselves that lend themselves well to lancers more than shotties, and hammerburst was better anyways. Gnasher wasn’t supposed to be as broken and as inconsistenr at G1 shotty and never was. Yes G2 had a well documented wall sticking issue that was patched in 09 but that was magnified by 10 in G1 and was always there once again another reason no one liked G1 let alone took it seriously.
G3 is as different from 2 and 2 is from 1 I don’t see how anyone can say it’s an expansion unless they’re trolling or stupid like I said earlier. It’s the same as if I said DMC2 is the best DMC.
This is my first time playing the series on multiplayer, so at first I was playing at the casual TD lobby for a while, got an almost 90% win rate, feeling pretty good about myself. Then I went on ranked and got literally blown up by shotguns of all variety, getting outplayed has never felt so frustrating. Don’t really have time to practice the game though, guess I’ll take my time…
I’m mainly talking about the speed of Gears 1 being far superior. Crap like stopping power and slow movement/sensitivity even with those at max is sluggish and dodging explosive crap at every inch is what makes 2 and 3 so EZ mode. Gears 1 is where the raw barebones gameplay will always shine, with far superior maps and 4v4 is way less cramped. I dunno playing 2 and 3 is like wading through molasses when trying to stunt and shotty dance. I play Ghost Recon for a far superior version of whatever Cliffy B is trying to concoct.
it’s bad on both ends. Devs take advantage of this but many gamers growing up today are now lazy self entitled babies who cry about anything these days when things don’t go their way. No one wants to bust their ass anymore for rewards. Everyone wants an easy button.
Oh okay, so you just like Gears 2 a lot. No wonder you lost your shit when your precious game was last on my personal list. Sorry dude but it was a mess.
Im down to play
GT=Rottona
I play what I find fun. Gears 3 is fun to me. Dont give a fuck how EZ mode it is
My god, this game looks good graphically. People who say this looks no better than gears 2 need their eyes checked. Single player is way more fun than gears 2 was so far.
Good stuff tonight Dreads, will have to do it again tomorrow!!!
Making gamertag room since this is the last multiplayer game until BF3/MW3 comes out… expect invites from Da Big Punisher within the next 3 days.
I don’t care about your “list” I was just pointing out what was wrong with your post which was almost everything. Ignoring facts and evidence than saying what amounts to “lolumad” doesn’t make you any less ignorant about a game you haven’t played much of.
Campaign is ridiculous G3 is wayyy better than 1 or 2 combined.
gets popcorn
Honestly I liked the Gears 1 campaign over 2 and 3, it’s a subjective answer and not a fact. Same with MP, just he gave poor reasons and bashed Gears 3 MP before even playing it (lol one match).
So personally: campaign 1, MP 3.
This game is so good, need to finally try out Hordes tonight.
I like this one and what it does for the locus side
***couldn’t find a beast game 
*** ME and 4 Bots took out 3 real people and 2 bots…
BOTS do not FUCK AROUND! lmfao
I was doin very good last night but when it all went sour I stopped… No sense in staying up all night losing, getting frustrated, and knowing you can hit those shots usually! ’
Question! What button is it the Weapon execution once you get 200 bodies on that weapon
(for the most part, I know )
x= take hostage
HOLDING y = when the punch them or beat them with their arm
shot y = Crub stomp or something else thats rather quick
B= melee hit that will kill them.
I said I liked G3 campaign the most that kind of statement is clearly my subjective opinion however, my previous post when I explained the problems with gears MP I didn’t bring my opinion into that post I only stated facts. If I say the sky is blue or the sun is hot I can only hope others know I’m stating a fact not opinion =P.
I guess so, I pretty much agreed with you so yeah.
Hostility runnin’ wild in the Gears thread.
Is it just me or does the sawed off suck ass compared to the Gnasher? I see no reason to pick it. Retro Lancer is kind of cool but I more or less just run with the Hammer as usual.
gnasher is for that zone when you’re in between AR and very close
How does it stack VS. a Retro at close range?
(SO fails… haha)
So is good if you’re good at bating and want that ez kill (it often trades though :/)
or blind siding them
Gnasher i a little harder to use but both from close do insta killa…