Deadpool Movie Thread

Do you guys think that RR is just gonna randomly do Deadpool shit whenever he feels like even when the movie isnā€™t being worked on? Just like one day heā€™s lazing around and heā€™s like ā€œā€¦Deadpool dayā€.

Spawn? Is that you?

Thatā€™s not even Liefeld. Thatā€™s Ian Churchill.

Yeah, that girl in the back had nowhere near as unrealistic a waistline to be by Liefeld.

Just realized that, since sheā€™s no longer a mutant, Squirrel Girl wonā€™t be able to appear in a film with the evil, evil man.

ā€œmutantā€ was a classification beneath her anyway.

How can you put a label like that on a god?

The more rights Marvel has the better, as far as iā€™m concerned.

People wanting Kevin Nash as Cable.

ā€¦
ā€¦
lol.

Itā€™s all fun and games until Cable tears his quad.

AHVā€¦OH SHIT MY QUAD

Finally saw it. It was everything I wanted it to be. Even when I already got spoiled by all the trailers and jokes, I still loved it.

The theater was still packed even weeks after the release day.

And wtf? Ryan said there was going to be 2 post-movie scenes, but I didnā€™t expect THATā€¦

Soā€¦ is movie Deadpool really a

[details=Spoiler]mutant? Being a mutant is detectable, if X-men can take Deadpoolā€™s blood test and detect mutant gene in there and decides to recruit him as an X-men, then heā€™s actually a mutant.

What bothers me is how simply an average joe could become a mutant just by activating their dormant mutant gene. According to the Deadpool movie, every one on Earth is a dormant mutant. If thatā€™s the case, how can X-men even say who is a mutant or not? How can mutant registration act even work when the only difference between mutants and average people is activated vs unactivated?[/details]

It makes sense if mutant is just the next stage of human evolution.

Iā€™m wondering if this will be covered in the new Xmen movie.

Not everyone is.

Spoiler

Ajax stated that there were those who died in the process simply because they actually didnā€™t have an unactivated X-gene.

I missed that, I thought he was just saying if your body is too weak to handle the punishment youā€™d die.

Donā€™t give me that look, you know I donā€™t read these comics. For all I know Apocalypse could have fucked more hoes than Genghis Khan :rofl:

(Well, from I remember 10 days on, AjaxFrancisā€™s statement could be taken either way, especially since neither option is mutually exclusive.)

I know itā€™s been more than a decade since Iā€™ve read American superhero comics with any regularity, but before the reboot with this ā€œDOMG! Inhumans > Mutants!ā€ thing the post-Battleworld comics are trying to push in the current Marvel comicsā€¦

[details=Spoiler]Every human on Earth was potentially a mutant with a potential X-gene before Scarlet Witch went ā€œNo More Mutants!ā€ due to what the Celestials did to mankind eons ago at the dawn of man. Itā€™s part of the reason why the Sentinels in later comics generally tend to end up destroying humanity as a whole in one of the numerous, seemingly inevitable Bad Futures that Marvel always ends up using, like in Days of Future Past actually. Similarly, that potential is arguably why the empowered people who arenā€™t technically mutants like Spider-Man or The Hulk or the Fantastic Four end up getting powers instead of dying from things that even in comic books would generally kill ā€œnormalā€ people despite their powers not coming from (actual) magic (ignoring that totem bullshit in Spider-man).

Of course, that gets into the never-ending trap of trying to apply realism to comic-books that go out of their way to eschew them, soā€¦[/details]

Technically it could come up in the next X-Men movie given that Apocalypseā€™s background in the comic books was/is heavily linked with the Celestials, but it likely wonā€™t, and thatā€™s probably for the better given Foxā€™s taint is on the X-men movies and Deadpool is mercifully devoid of said taint for the most part.

Wait. Are you seriously complaining the Hollywood did what it always does and went with Hollywood Ugly despite the fact that they already knew that a lot of people would be attracted to the movie sheerly for the fact that Ryan Reynolds is attractive on superficial level and Reynolds & co. had to push for this movie to having an R rating as it is?

Next Iā€™m going to hear people complain that the sex scenes werenā€™t long enough and didnā€™t show enough nudity despite how prudish America is. I mean, sure, they could have made him uglier and I could even understand being at least somewhat disappointed in that, but you honestly shouldnā€™t be surprised they didnā€™t and I think itā€™s unfair to count it as being a ā€œpussyā€ move when even with the mask on a large part of marketing movie is knowing that itā€™s (fuckable) Ryan Reynolds underneath the mask, to say nothing of aforementioned movie ratings risk.

Itā€™s obvious they pick specific people. They have access to peopleā€™s medical records when they really shouldnā€™t be able to. MAYBE they also check to make sure they really do have that dormant x-gene.

I donā€™t think they can show Apocalypse relation to the Celestials directly though, not with them having appeared in GoTG already (confirming that Marvel has the rights to them).

(To be honest, I doubt that Singer (?) even bothered with Apocalypseā€™s connection to the Celestials and likely wouldnā€™t have bothered even if he could have gotten the rights to them.)

Iā€™ll admit that the Celestials are quite obscure for people who donā€™t read comics, read comics casually or even just got into X-men ā€œlateā€ (read: post-Decimation), but given utilizing said connection would take actual effort, which seems relatively anathema to the X-Men movie franchise in general outside most of X-2 and arguably Days of Future Past, I doubt any mention of the connection will show up. Itā€™s not like it needs to anyway, at least as far as Deadpool is concerned.

Fox can still link him to other aliens they do have in their wheelhouse