Ah, I see. Fair enough.
The fact that people are making money just for uploading rips of someone’s stream or video game music rips is pretty disrespectful personally… so yeah, if they were removed for making money for themselves… that seems well deserved imo. I’m not so much against the idea of restreams that have some insight/commentary for quick covered moments, along with certain gaming music (although stuff like gaming music can definitely be removed since things like OSTs can exist and can hurt some of their products… in that case I can see why those situations are bad).
What I don’t get is how to tell if someone monetizes stuff in Youtube. Last I saw, someone was uploading Blazblue music and had advertisements show up during the video. Doubt that signals that monetization is active or not, but if it is… that’s pretty shameful.
If an ad appears, it’s likely monetized. If you have a monetized channel, you have options on which videos have ads appear on them, as well as what type of ads (commercials that play before, banners that appear in the game, etc.).
Evo owns the content under license from Capcom.
You straight ripped the video from us (no fair use).
If you would have PMed me or hit me up on Twitter and been civil, I would have removed the strike from your channel.
Don’t understand the logic here.