Mk Was A Beast Game When It Came Out…But I Do Gotta Agree Its All Downhill Now
BTW:
Anyone Figure Out How To Do Liu Kangs Hidden Fireball Fatality…As Seen In The Background On The Pit 2?? Lol
My first fighting game was MK1. I really liked it. Mortal Kombat 2 was very good too, too bad Mileena and Jax were too powerful (although there is always the character that can level with him/her). I found MK3 laughable, I never played UMK3 (I was playing too much in the arcades and made the commitment to stop wasting time and money there and give more time to my other important things). MK4 was bad as a fighting game, but fun as a 3D novelty. As some poeople have said, gameplay went downhill afterwards. I also agree that new MK’s are just to make more money. Just add a lot of fatalities and gore and forget gameplay.
What worries me is that some people just trash the game:
1-Never having played it. I never dug street fighter series, but, a couple of months ago I said, well, let’s try it. And after having played third strike I really liked it. I can see the art, and the skill required to play it. But I had to put down my stupid paradigm first.
2-Watching some combos on youtube and saying that the game is broken. Do you really think, albeit some exceptions, that those are really doable in a serious match between 2 good players?
3-Don’t give arguments, or they do but, again, from other sources and never having played it.
I really think the first 2D ones required skill (block a flying kick and uppercut in a serious match), a lot of years ago I played here in my country and there were a lot of skilled people, and that’s why I liked them as fighting games.
let the Japanese make an MK title.
solved.