a draft would be a great idea. the people who are interested in law enforcement would actually stay on and move up the ranks, while those not interested would just do their 2-3 years and go on to other things.<div><br></div><div>that said, i think we should have conscriptive service all around.</div>
Order and law enforcement are not the same thing, and anarchy and order are not opposites.<br>
<blockquote class=“Quote”>
<div class=“QuoteAuthor”><a href="/profile/2992/goodm0urning">goodm0urning</a> said:</div>
<div class=“QuoteText”>Order and law enforcement are not the same thing, and anarchy and order are not opposites.<br></div>
</blockquote>
shhh…anarchism is chaos, we need not highlight the inner contradictions of government and state.<br>Yeh, its a good thing we have these cops to keep the order!<br>
<span style=“font-style: normal;”><blockquote class=“Quote”>
<div class=“QuoteAuthor”><a href="/profile/601/Raz0r">Raz0r</a> said:</div>
<div class=“QuoteText”>wtf at my posts needing to be approved. What’s going on with this upgrade?</div>
</blockquote><div><span style=“font-style: normal;”><br></span></div><div><span style=“font-style: normal;”><br></span></div><div><span style=“font-style: normal;”><br></span></div><div><span style=“font-style: normal;”><br></span></div>
No it’s just you…because you are a </span><i>cunt</i>.
<blockquote class=“Quote”>
<div class=“QuoteAuthor”><a href="/profile/13708/pedoviejo">pedoviejo</a> said:</div>
<div class=“QuoteText”><blockquote class=“Quote”>
<div class=“QuoteAuthor”><a href="/profile/8113/Pertho">Pertho</a> said:</div>
<div class=“QuoteText”>Whether you agree or disagree with Dorner, this is more or less what the purpose of the second amendment looks like in action. This should technically be the moment where americans realize that fighting a tyranical organization will involve shooting people who are good but part of it. People should also ask where the line is between peaceful resolution and/or armed conflict. The funniest one comes from conspiracy as a crime; how can you organize a revolution and fully use your second amendment rights in it if is illegal to gather around to plan an illegal act? Seems that it is legal to have weapons but not to plan action.<br><br>Oh well. Dumbfuckery all around. <br></div>
</blockquote>
<br>couldn’t one make the argument that since this countries government is the people of the nation, not the federal government, that the people have the legal right and obligation to get rid of the current infrastructure if need be and replaced with one that functions at it should.<br><br>__________<br><br>If you are a part of an institution that promotes violence against “enemies”, but you never partake in said violence, however you never speak out against it fully knowing that it happens all the time. Does that not make you as guilty as the one that does partake?<br><br><br><blockquote class=“Quote”>
<div class=“QuoteAuthor”><a href=“http://forums.shoryuken.com/profile/16179/Lord_Raptor”>Lord_Raptor</a> said:</div>
<div class=“QuoteText”><p>As long as the blue Wall of Silence exist and is treated as okay law enforcement will stay a joke.</p><p> </p><p>And
we really have people treating Dorner like some fucking Saint in this
thread? I agree with what the man felt about the LAPD, but him killing
people who had nothing to do with it pointed out he was just as fucked
up as the rest. He killed people, people who had nothing to do with him
and a girl who’s only sin was being the daughter of the man who fired
him. That’s some straight Char Anzable killing Garma shit and just as
bitchmade. Seriously saying it was karmic payback to the father and that
makes it okay? I hope you never do anything that slights someone in
anyway and they got retribution on you through you’re lovesd ones and
get mad, becaus it was just karmic payback right?</p></div>
</blockquote>
<br>Nigga, don’t brink Char into this shit. <br><br>If Char had only killed Degwin, the other 4 would have taken revenge against Char and tried and killed him. 2 birds with one stone. <br><br>Hurt Degwin, and protect himself in the future by eliminating actual future threats.<br><br>He had no choice. The only other choice was to be like Sayla and pretend nothing ever happened and stand by knowing who killed his father.<br><br>False equivalency also. Had Degwin only punched his dad, or robbed power by exiling Char’s father, then your last statement would be correct. But killing somebody for personal gain is a little more than slighting somebody.<br><br></div>
</blockquote>
You forget Kycilia ended up figuring out who Char was long before she died and chose not to act against him partly out of their old friendship and also because she understood why. Garma could ahve gone either way, Dozle and Ghiren were in on his fathers murder, which makes it hilarious seeing how Char ever got any of the people actually involved. Kycilia killed hiren after he killed their father and Dozel was killed by Amuro. Also I find Char to be a douchebag, seeing how multiple times he let his own men, men who looked up to them go to their deaths to try and further his vendettas. CCA got his character right, a character who has reasons to be slighted but goes about them like a total idiot. Only good thing about that sshitty movie other than fights and designs.