What I noticed was they couldn’t even find a token minority for the background.
And who ever asked of course I have talked to Trump supporters in person and that includes family and friends and its no different than online. Same parroting/regurgitated shit.
Seems like a deliberately misleading summary, given that it’s just about taking a polygraph. I believe the appropriate descriptive word may be “nuance”… but “passing” implies something incorrect here, according to that statement.
I assume that this will become a character assassination tactic considering everyone wanted to dismiss them otherwise. Granted, if this is true, then there is a definite uphill battle going forward unless some hard evidence comes out or a better character witness statement is obtained. To be fair, Kavanaugh lied about the drinking age under oath and having no connections to Yale.
I certainly didn’t speak to her take on polygraphs, I specifically spoke to the title which is a hack job at best and maliciously misleading at worst.
Given that Monica has come out and specifically denied this…
I don’t know how much mileage this gets.
On the other hand, let’s apply this same standard being called for to Kavanaugh’s testimony. And in reality-ville, the SCOTUS nominee should be the one held to the higher standard.
I’m going to request that you at least post a summary of why any particular video is interesting. That seems like a really easy thing to do. After the previous video you posted wherein all liberals were declared as lying evil demons, I think it’s the least you can do.
Same goes for anyone else. If the video isn’t self-descriptive… make it easier for everybody else.
Are we including Fox News in the discussion? If not, then there really isn’t much to support his claim. Now if he said more progressive media, then we’d have a more correct summary in the title. It wasn’t even a minute before “LEFT” was uttered.
People were actually triggered over this . . . . . People need to get a grip on reality.