I’d usually entertain this with humerous but I’m just gonna summarize and clarilize this whole feminist movement happenin as short as I possibly can.
DO.THIS.IN.THE.COUNTRIES.WHERE.IT.IS.ACTUALLY.A.PROBLEM>Propaganda ass niggas I tell you.
Do this in saudi arabia or china :bawling: Don’t do this in the one country you probably have all of the freedom you can ask for -_-…
There’s people in the world who probably get sliced to pieces for exposing ankles and stuff, or hilariously bad population laws.
This isn’t helping them, bitching about no females in videogames or movies or not having a strong leading woman in media is going to help people actually in some deep ass problems, facing actual oppression from the people these niggas is claiming they are against in the first place.
Fight for the rights of those who are actually in that situation. Can’t help them on twitter, tumblr, youtube, vine lol help them niggas for real if it bothers them that much.
If you have a nice job, a nice bed, nice food, nice things, not being degraded in any way by “society”, have nice attire, nice surroundings, not being in no shit for dressing any type of way, then sit down.
There’s a pretty distinct difference in the respect levels being displayed here, or you really saying that guy deserved to be told to fuck off before he got 3 words out?
Not really but I am so desensitized to it I don’t really care. Finding a couple of assholes on the street telling men to fuck off is nothing to be concerned about. Men are taught to be caring to women so the responses don’t shock me at all.
Instead of responding to each post individually, I’d like to address a line of logic that seems to be quite prevalent in this thread.
**Premises: **
X < Y.
People are talking about X when Y exists.
**Conclusion: **
Therefore, we should not talk about X when Y exists.
Let’s see how this plays out when we start plugging in for our variables.
Premises:
Capcom’s Business Model < Starving Children
People are talking about Capcom’s Business Model when Starving Children exist.
Conclusion:
Therefore, we should not talk about Capcom’s Business Model when Starving Children exist.
Spoiler
This logic also proves that @“po pimpus” is a jerk.
**Problem: **
This logic attempts to truncate all discussion on a topic by prioritizing other things, claiming that we cannot discuss or actively address a topic while something else greater exists. The problem here is that if this is true we basically cannot discuss anything except for whatever happens to be the worst or most pressing matter. It ignores the fact that people often seek discourse on things that are not the most serious problem that exists, as more serious problems are often far harder to address and solve. It would be like telling a cancer patient they shouldn’t be concerned about the splinter in their finger because they have cancer.
Just for fun though, let’s plug in one more set of variables:
Premises:
Bitching about Faux-Feminists on an Internet Forum < Starving Children.
People are bitching about Faux-Feminists when Starving Children exist.
Conclusion:
Therefore, we should not be bitching about Faux-Feminists on an Internet Forum when Starving Children exist.
Spoiler
Note that by this logic @“po pimpus” is still a jerk.
But in all seriousness, do you think you could maybe try and chill on the ad hominems? If you want to think of me in that manner that is your freedom to do so. I’m not going to judge for being fixated on penises and wanting others to have them.
Well if the NYPD is busy arresting people for petty garbage they are a lot less likely to arrest you for that crack rock in your pocket, so i see where you comin from Razor.