Yeah, I know all that. It just seems like a really cumbersome, unnecessary change.
It’s not like I need tonamento to run a tournament. I was running tournaments way before tonamento existed, so anything that tonamento does, that makes it harder for me to run my shit, isn’t really welcome. I had been running tonamento just to do my part to get a larger data pool for rankings, for the scene at large… but it seems like nobody uses tonamento rankings for seedings anyway, and the tonamento ranking algorithm is weird as fuck too… so, IDK.
With the reinstatement of organizer player filling, I’ll go back to it next week, just for the fuck of it. I’ll try to get my guys to sign up, themselves, but not HAVING to have that happen is huge, IMO.
I respect what damdai is trying to do here, but too much of tonamento seems to be based on some utopian ideal of what SF tournaments should be, instead of what they really are. If you’re trying to steer the scene in a certain direction, you need to do it gradually. I know a lot of organizers that don’t use tonamento, or use it begrudgingly, because of some of the shit that is put in place just to try to control how tournaments should be. People come late to SF events… Not being able to put them into tonamento isn’t gonna stop people from coming late, or stop organizers from putting them in the brackets. tonamento’s policies aren’t going to change that, and it just serves to make it more difficult to run a tournament, when you have to keep track of who’s who, in your tournament, because you had to put somebody into a bye spot.
That’s just an example, but shit like that is what I’m talking about. tonamento is cool, but IMO, it should just be about data collection, and assisting running tournaments, not controlling how the tournaments should be run, from sign-up, to execution.