I can’t fathom people who don’t find discussions about The Big Questions interesting.
So, while I’m on the subject, I would also like to point out that there is a huge difference between being ‘Religious’ in the sense of being a Muslim/Christian/Jew/Hindu, and being theistic in a general philosophical sense.
I was always the latter. I hung around with the hare krishnas for a while, heard them out, even tried their goddamn chanting. Didn’t get any superpowers. Didn’t see the sense in it. Never became one.
So while I CAN understand general theism (in fact, it is very, very understandable and reasonable, in a way), what I cannot understand is religion. It is incredibly stupid. I’m sorry to all the believers here, and it is very hard for me to say this to a believer, but it is stupid to believe your book has the exclusive metaphysical truth over another’s.
As for all this talk of “what the world would be like without religion”, I don’t think you could argue it would be the same, Hoax. That’s like saying that hey, the national socialism ethos didn’t influence the nazis actions in any way.
And the REASON for this is that to a deeply religious person, a suicide bomber’s actions make sense. They are totally rational if you take into account their (deluded) premises.
- God is real
- God has an opinion on non-believers
- God wants you to kill non-believers
- God will reward you handsomly for killing the non-believers
(The above are the delusional premises)
- There are some non-believers
Therefore…
- You should go kill the non-believers.
Without the deluded premises, what reason does the person have to go kill the non-believers? Unless you are claiming that human reason has no bearing on human actions, which would invalidate many of the sciences and the arts.
EDIT: or, yes, the spanish inquisition. That’s a good one. Perhaps some people are born sadists, but without religion to provide them a framework from within which to act, what would they be beyond a disorganised rabble, or even just individual psychos?