^ This. You’re just a fucking scumbag b00g.
5 Likes
And here me
I love you too
It’s 3am why in the flying fuck does this IHOP employee have one shoe off and one shoe on?
3 Likes
Wait…your quarantine period is over?
1 Like
Relatable.
Fortunately, there are some based bus drivers in this city.
Ignoring Satsui no Hadou driver, there was this older driver that looked a bit like Little Richard who ran a tight ship. He’d look out for passengers on the night rides, and kick unruly a-holes off of buses.
God bless that man.
The bus was also how I got to hear most of the then new DMX album, thanks to some rotted urethra just blasting the damned thing at the back of the bus circa 2000. Maaan, I just got off work. . . 
2 Likes
Gill thinks he’s slick…
4 Likes
I mean, isn’t he?
A vote for either party is a vote for The Illuminati! 
Gill’s new Super Art should be 4D Chess.
We have a political thread, can you keep the political post over there please?
Yeah been free for a week and a half now
4 Likes
Awesome…
Charges got dropped. I wonder why, wonder how the innanet feels cuz they were ready to cancel Torey
They were justified in their feelings. She had bullet fragments in her foot… Come on you think that randomly just happened?
Case was weird as fuck from the jump, there’s was multiple conflicting stories, that’s why I didn’t immediately take anybodys side and let the system play out. The internet makes knee-jerk reactions to things all the time without thinking first, so I wouldn’t exactly say they were justified since they don’t know the full details
I’m dying to know exactly what happened but I doubt we ever will now
1 Like
They both went radio silent understandably. But the fact she came out and had bullet damage to her foot should be a big ass sign he did something. To my knowledge only four people were involved the driver/bodyguard, Meg, him and a mystery girl i believe. With all that, 100% the internet has been justified in canceling him
The internet is almost never justified in canceling anybody hecause the internet works on gut reaction and not fact, information, or data. You literally said “To my knowledge” meaning it might not be complete, then followed up with “100% justified.”
Like no son. Not how that’s supposed to work.
2 Likes
Based on the information that was officially released yes they were justified. If new official information comes out that counters it then they aren’t. Based on findings then it was.
You and i both know that if the info changes down the road it’s too late, they’ve already been canceled and having to deal with the fallout. The retraction won’t get near as many eyes as the accusation did.
1 Like
And honestly in the end he’ll be fine. Dumbass released an album in the admist of it all. It did well enough. It’s Chris brown all over again. Initial cancelation clearly didn’t stick. Which is a wholeeer other issue in general that bothers me.
Bingo. Literally all someone has to do these days is say you did some shit even if u didn’t actually do it, and the internet RUNS with it. You’ve lost your job/career even if later on you have proved your innocence, yo life is ruined and the accuser gets away free. How ppl FEEL is more important than actual facts, Look at the shit with Johnny Depp
(I’m not saying he did or didn’t shoot her cuz idk, just speaking in general)
1 Like