I explained this in my previous post. It’s not my fault that you only quote one small passage from it and ignore the rest. I will not repeat everything.
This statement is already false since those trailers show what happens after SF2, not SF4.
And I already explained in length why it is unlikely that the aftermath of SF2 from the trailer is supposed to play after a scene where Bison was actually attacked by Akuma and where the SF2 game endings happened.
The plot guide is a fan project and Vasili is an idiot.
Here, let me show you two things that are wrong in his guide:
Source: http://www.gamefaqs.com/ps3/722788-ultra-street-fighter-iv/faqs/69921
“His name in the actual canon still isn’t Charlie Nash, though.”
Yes, it is. It has been confirmed in one of Guile’s anime cutscenes in SF4 where they show Charlie’s dog tags that show the complete name. Vasili claimed this is a non-canon “easter egg”, but that’s bullshit: The SF5 trailer (not the cinematic one, the first one) showed the dog tags as well. And in Bison’s story mode, C. Viper says Charlie’s full name, even in Japanese. So, Vasili is wrong and has been wrong.
Shall I link you these three sources (Guile’s cutscene, SF5 trailer and Bison SF5 story mode), including the exact second where it appears on the screen or do you remember that stuff yourself?
Another example:
“Nash- Doesn’t die until SFZ3”
In SF5, it is undeniable that Charlie “died” like in his SFA2 ending, not like in his SFA3 ending. But this isn’t anything new. SF4 already alluded to this fact with Charlie being shown in Guile’s cutscenes falling down or being shown after he was shot in the back. So, the SFA3 Charlie dying in an explosion ending was already retconned by the time of SF4.
In fact, people on this very forum concluded that Charlie’s SFA2 ending is the new canon version of his supposed death month before SF5 came out. But Vasili still went by Guile’s SFA3 ending, despite his latest plot guide version including all SF4 versions up to USF4.
Also, he claimed that Gouken isn’t really alive, based on…nothing in particular. And again, he got his ass kicked by Ryu’s SF5 story mode.
So, don’t ever cite me the plot guide of the idiotic person who also has been exposed as a liar who tries to include his personal fan fiction into the “Street Fighter” canon instead of representing the sources faithfully.
If you want to prove anything, show me the actual sources that Vasili claims to refer to. For example, if Ono confirmed something in an interview, show me a video or a magazine article or a website article of a magazine with Ono’s interview and we’ll talk. Don’t show me a text by Vasili saying “Ono said this and that.”