That, I found weird especially after it shows he knows of Frank West and from the clip, it looks like Hagger is fought twice.
Regarding Marvel Comics, I’ve been unhappy with them for a while, but it has nothing to do with diversity. I’m all for it, but you run the risk of offending your intended audience sometimes when you try and pander too much. When I was a kid, during recess I NEVER got to be Wolverine or the Green Ranger, I was always made to be Bishop. When I used to draw, I loved making all sorts of OCs, but I prided myself on making black characters that could be something different and not yet another formally-from-the-hood-was-arrested-now-a-hero type. So I’m all for making new characters with a diverse background, but I don’t like clumsy tokenism. We can tell when a decision is done to generate headlines and not readership. Many times Marvel has pushed “The First___” hero while ignoring their past achievements because they weren’t marketable enough. I seem to recall something like that happening with Kamala Khan and them ignoring some Muslim X-men entirely. I dig the little I’ve read of her and think she’s a fine addition. I’ll cover more of her later.
My main issues have been the over abundance of events, ever-increasing (and annoying) shock-value events (usually killing off a hero) and the at-times messy pushing of legacy characters.
I’ll say this, I’m fine with legacy characters, but so many all at once at the cost of some of my favs isn’t interesting to me. I look at Ms. Marvel as doing it right. She’s a new character that’s filling the young hero in their early adventures style that Spidey had going for ages, but she doesn’t have the EXACT powerset as Capt Marvel or look just like her. She’s an adorable fan girl who took up an old moniker and wants to honour her hero. She’s not an oddly-specific carbon copy of her predecessor.
Marvel also has WAAAAY too many Spiders with not enough changes between them. I mean look, now we have:
Peter
Ben
Kaine
Miguel O’Hara
Miles
Gwen
Silk
That’s waaaaaay too much redundancy for my part, but it’s interesting. You can have multiples of the character type without replacing. I’m for letting new characters get introduced and grow - by solo book or starting off in a team book.
I’m a symbiote fan. Always been a Eddie Brock fan, but was unsure of how the “new Venom” was gonna be, but I gave him a chance. Fast forward years later and I absolutely LOVE Flash Thompson. With Flash, he got his own sidekick of sorts, in Mania, a student of Flash’s that got an offshoot of the symbiote in an accident. They co-existed for a while until Flash recently lost his suit to a new character and that character lost it to Brock. With Flash and Mania, their relationship (teacher and pseudo adoptive father made for an interesting relationship and they could grow more compelling tales for the two of them without killing anyone off.
Another example I’m fond of; I like Amadeus Cho. While I prefer him as being a human that’s super smart and witty, I was fine with him being the Hulk. The stories of him and a cured Banner were penned by the excellent Greg Pak and I felt that it was a great direction (though Bendis killed Banner uneccessarily in Civil War 2) Bruce finally being free and being a mentor to Amadeus as he made his way through his newfound existence could have been a solid path. Without Bendis’ interference this could have continued, but he had Banner killed off and thus having him replaced.
I loved seeing Rachel Cole-Alvez be an ally to the Punisher after losing her husband to tragedy. Frank and her understood each other, there was kinship, respect, and similar skills. She’s been criminally underused since the end of Greg Rucka’s Punisher run. She worked well as an ally who WAS NOT lined up to be a romantic lead. There was respect and connection there and I could see her grow to a point where eventually she could leave Frank and have her own adventures. Her wanting vengeance, but not being totally dead-inside like Frank gave her some interesting potential for character growth.
For me, it you do a good passing of the torch, you’ve got gold, but a lot of these recent legacy-identity adoptions bother me because of the sheer simultaneous launch of them and how it’s all going to be temporary, it also needlessly takes the potential away from new characters growing into their own. I just…I want more characters made to be their own without having to be borrowing an identity so heavily, more like how you’ve got Luke Cage, Storm, Jubilee, T’Challa and more.
We’ve got more people than ever aware of comics, in large part to the marvel movies, but also due to comics opening up and not being an obscure hobby. We can and should see a large amount of fans and characters from drastically different creeds, sexualities, ethnicities and more being involved. I just don’t want it done as a PR stunt and have potential shoved back into the attic once things aren’t as fresh anymore.
I dunno, this is getting long and I’m rambling, but I think DC is handling things generally better on several fronts now and I really want to pick up some of their titles. I have my current Marvel favs, but in combination with general comic prices these days, I’m just not reading the large amount of books I used to when I was younger.
tl;dr: Diversity isn’t bad for comics and has great potential, excessive company-wide events weighs us all down, clumsy implementation of new characters while tossing away old favourites will be bad in the long run for everyone.