OH WOW!!! Today on chess.com they had Magnus Carlsen vs 10 chess.com qualifers in a simul on chess.com!!! It’s like having 10 average Street Fighter players qualifying for a chance to beat someone like Momochi in USF4 or 10 average poker players going heads up against Phil Ivey or 10 average tennis players going up against Novak Djokovic:
^These commentators were sucking on that Magnus cock. Treat this guy like a normal person and let Magnus have fun with this. Nigga is only like 23 I think.
Chess.com@3rdSTRikeLOVE that website is great. I don’t like online chess because of misclicks but whoever is down for a match I don’t mind playing.
I used to frequent Yahoo a ton but my accounts got straight jacked. I’d have to say Yahoo’s player quality is better because you have players with 10s of thousands of games under their belt.
Something I don’t get about chess openings: I see various types of openings, but they require the opponent to move in the same manner. What if I want to do, for instance, Two Knights Defense, I get my pieces out accordingly, but my opponent does something different? Is that still Two Knights defense, or just on my part? Is it better for the opponent to not do their part of this opening? Do people recognize these things and go like “Oh, he’s doing Two Knights Defense, so I will screw him up by not doing my sequence of the opening”?
How can people use various chess openings if their opponent does not follow suit?
@warrior’s dream not all deviations from the opening books are bad. However the difference between the best opening moves and sound opening moves aren’t that different except to a high level player.
Deviating from a familiar opening is a strategy but most likely not in your level of play. At first I suggest the natural moves(common sense ones such as developing pieces and center protection).
Also, Hikaru Nakamura qualifies for the 2016 Candidates Tournamnet for a chance to win it and go on to being the challenger for the World Chess Championship!