I really don’t see what’s wrong about building a wall. Could someone educate me on how it’s racist to try to keep criminals out of your country because I’m surely not getting it.
It’s just Self and or white people hate, Marxists who want to establish azatlan and re-distribute white money to brown people in South America.
It’s open border stuff, living in the first world is a privledge so their goal is to make the entire world a third world. Cuz equality, everyone starve.
the funny thing is that obama could have not exanded the deficit like he did if he paid the government off when the big car and banks paid them back in full and with interest.
Is open border marxist? I always thought open border is anarchist/capitalist because increase labor supply lowers wages, but socialist party wants open border, that doesn’t match the ideology.
Because that worked out so very well for the economy and world peace.
Well…
The 1% got bailed out from the housing bubble they created, at least.
And Syria got carpet bombed by incessant drone strikes.
But at least it had plenty of company in the Middle East who got to share in the violent crimes against humanity perpetrated on behalf of the Federal Government’s Israeli owners.
So, um yeah… Obama is a fantastic example of what a president should be.
While Hillary was talking about the Orlando shooting in a Florida rally, news crew spotted the shooter’s father in the crowd and later interviewed him.
An open border can be Anarch/Libert/Cap, it depends how the power is centralized. That would require less mandates, entitlements, taxes etc. We don’t have that.
We have a broad mandatory entitlement, and by opening the borders they are simply moving the regulation to Global treaties/U.N away from the voters and applying it world wide. Global governance.
What is transpiring with the open border with Mexico is more likened to the U.S.S.R and the borders of those numerous countries being merged.
I am surprised he wasn’t an invited speaker. Hillary should of told a story about how he looks like her son if she had one with Obama. How he was trying to make his life better and how it was wrong for the police to shoot his child.
Look who was selected. And I mean chosen purposefully for Hillarys staged crowd shots.
Hillary supporters realize they vet those who are in the camera shot, usually adhering to a strict seating chart of: gay white male, black woman, white woman, mexican woman, hijab wearing Muslim seating chart with occasional camera pan face reaction/close up from a trans.
The deficit isn’t 20 trillion. The deficit is about 1/33rd of that at about 600 billion, and is largely controlled by Congress. Congress is the body required by law to pass appropriations annually.
The national debt IS about 20 trillion, and is the running sum of accrued annual deficits stretching back to long before Obama was a glint in his father’s eye. Remember, we were operating under a budget surplus and shrinking the debt under Bill Clinton (regardless of what you may think of him), and that was the only point in any of our lifetimes or most of our parents’ lifetimes that the debt was shrinking. It was G.W. Bush who reversed our surplus into deficit, and he did that as soon as he took office- BEFORE the recession (caused largely by follow-on effects of banking deregulation under Reagan) or the two wars G.W.'s administration started. Spending under Obama has largely followed the curve initiated under G.W., and that curve arose out of steps undertaken to engender economic recovery.
And aside from all of this, governments operating at some level of deficit and carrying some burden of debt is almost certainly a good thing as federal deficits encourage economic growth, and federal debts are tools against currency deflation given that central banks can always counter deflation with inflation by printing fresh money to throw at debts.
I already knew most of that.
the budget deficit grew substantially during the Obama years same as during the bush years. I hate them both.
Hate is a strong word. I highly dislike both of them. They are our leaders and both wrote checks they couldn’t cash so fuck the both of them.
Anywho a quick google search picks this up:
Also as an FYI, I LOVED Clinton as a president. 2 faced as he was he did shit right by my political understanding of the day.
I don’t think Hilary for any second is Bill 2.0
Nope, not one bit. Bitch is probably even more corrupt than her husband but can’t evade the bullshit like good Ol slick willy could. So no Hilary for me.
Okay, great that you know it. But you might want to take care to make sure the things you say about it are correct, because a fuck-ton of people don’t know much about it at all and will end up believing all kinds of falsehoods just because it sounded like the person they heard it from knew what they were talking about.
I think one of them is a fuck-tard and the other is lackluster and milquetoast, and for this it doesn’t matter which is which. Because here’s the thing- debt for a sovereign power that controls its own currency is very different from private debt. The US could tomorrow print a brand new 20 trillion dollar bill and instantly pay off the entirety of its debt. The inflation would be STAGGERING, but still no where near as bad as it is for the truly fucked economies of the world, and the US gov’t could probably offset much of the effect to be about no worse that the immediate effect of the Brexit vote on Great Britain’s economy (the US federal government holds about $130 trillion in assets by itself). This would even turbo charge sectors of our economy for a few years as US exports would become enormously more attractive to foreign buyers, and really the greatest harm from it would be the degree to which it would destabilize the global economy. The world literally needs a stable dollar and US federal debt to shelter its assets in.
Hillary is just a different figurehead on the same political machine that ran things during Bill’s presidency, and the only big difference is that she has VASTLY less charisma. Remember, much of the success of the Clinton years mostly came out of the Internet bubble economy. The government could operate at a surplus because there was an anomalous amount of revenue coming in rather than because of tighter controls on spending (which, again, would largely be up to Congress rather than the president anyway).