…because none of them are the sitting president.

He isn’t the speaker of the house. Or a rep. Or a crazy youtuber. Or an srk poster.

He’s the President. It’s not the same.

How many years now have hillbillies been saying “the south will rise again”

Lul so one side been talking civil war since he took office and he quotes someone else bout the same and it’s the worst thing in the world.

Ok.

2 Likes

Did they ever stop? Atleast they’re upfront with their shitiness. :man_shrugging:t4:

1 Like

Im gonna leave it alone because you seem like you’re set on this whole deal but you gotta look at reach to understand why both being wrong is one thing and impact being another

Pelosi for example has around 3m followers on twitter and to hear what she says it usually takes a news story.

Trump meanwhile has about 65m followers and anything he says IS the news.

You’d have to combine every following of a dem who has said something like that and then multiply it by 5 for it to have the same reach as DJT.

This equivalence you’re drawing is intentionally dishonest at best

So he’s worse cause he has more twitter followers?

Talk about false equivalence and making a garbage argument.

He makes a tweet bout a quote but others including Hillary have talked civil war on national television which has many more tuning in than his circle jerk Twitter. Your argument is pathetically dumb. One of the dumbest things I’ve ever read.

But the nra been pushing this his entire run as president

1 Like

Like i said you’re being quite dishonest.

I laid out an example of his reach.

Choose.

DJT. The president.

Or any other politician outside obama.

Who has more reach.

Yeah, they’re going to rebel like all those other times they said they would…

The Civil War started because one group of rich people was in conflict with another group of rich people. Trump’s impeachment doesn’t threaten anyone when both parties are bought and owned.

1 Like

Meanwhile in Montana…

Only dishonest thing here is showcasing how things are only bad if the other side does it.

Your example is garbage. Hell look at r/ politics or other subreddits that lean left posting everything pelosi or Hillary says. Now look at r/The_Donald being fucking quarantined from exposure.

Twitter is the kicker, fucking lol.

So no answer then?

I already said your comment on reach is dumb and simply irrelevant.

I bring up both sides inciting violence and you talk about twitter followers deciding which is worse. We’ll just ignore all that civil war talk that took place from the Left after he won the election and years after cause he now has more twitter followers.

Thats not an answer. Bob and weave. I argued impact and reach. Words hold different weight depending on where they come from.

I already said both are wrong here…

And here…

Gonna answer which political figures words hold more weight and have more impact, or more Ali action?

Here’s the thing tho, if either side somehow provokes a civil war, both sides will be fighting.

The left talking about civil war will reach said hillbillies just like Trump. This civil war talk is rallying both sides at the same time.

1 Like

Trump using his Twitter to quote an evangelist that a Civil War will happen if he Trump is impeached.

Just when you think this moron counting be a bigger Shit stain, he goes and proves he can be.

Of course we have dipshits going “BOTH SIDES”.

1 Like

I already said your comment on reach is dumb and simply irrelevant.

Especially when you keep talking his words when he quoted someone else.

Civil war needs two sides. Both are trying to incite, both are equally guilty. Their reach extends to everyone involved in our politics. One is not higher than the other.

3 Likes

Nice post of fail as usual.

:-1:

1 Like

This must be what it was like to try and hit Mayweather in his prime lmao

1 Like

Mayweather is a con artist, so it could be said that he is still in his prime…