Yeah, can’t think of a single good reason to keep that one around. I’m not really sure that would be sufficient to stop the cartel effect, given that insurance companies already have associations that cross state lines, such as Blue Cross/Blue Shield.

My office is in a hospital, so I get plenty of exposure to insurance absurdity. Even you’d probably be shocked at how Byzantine that world is.

Doeant it get worse with the mandates that the comoa ies that insure hospitals from lawsuits, make the effect worse?

I remeber watching a video where private hospital owners where discussing why they didnt deal with medicare or insurance comoanies. Theres a whole set of red tape that involves what could be unnecessary testing in the form of mri, blood work etc, to diagnose so.ething simple. This arrificially increases the price of healthcare

So republicans agree to a spending deal

Doing the work of the dems.

That shutdown was a great look for the dems and now repubs agree to every overbloated budget

Good for me

But yeah thanks repubs. Funding government and giving 9/11 first responders what they should have

The various malpractice insurances contribute to healthcare costs, but it’s a different bucket of worms. Ultimately you want your healthcare providers to have that insurance, because if they fuck up badly enough that you need to sue them over it, you want to know that someone is going to be able to pay up when you win. Torte reform that caps lawsuit awards to reasonable amounts is the only good approach I’ve seen to mitigating that particular problem.

This is also a problem, but as much as it’s a cover-your-ass from malpractice suits problem, it’s also that some docs will order redundant tests just to run up the bill. Like a shifty auto mechanic.

2 Likes

Problem is how frivolous some of these malpractice claims are. What passes as a cause in court may or may not have any medical or scientific basis.

1 Like

Sure, but that’s a problem of the courts, and not one that only affects the healthcare industry.

At least awards in frivolous suits are also capped by torte reform. What else can you do that doesn’t royally screw legitimate victims?

1 Like

I don’t know what they expect to get out of the hearing outside of hearing a summarized version of a well redacted document. I guess it’ll be helpful since Congress didn’t read the report.

lol Matt Gaetz went full emotionally charged gish gallop

What a piece of shit
Actual low IQ

And you willingly and purposely listen to MSM trash. And will continue even after this blatant smear attack.

Is anyone’s news network worth watching nowadays?

I typically listen to NPR for news personally.

Not really, no.

2 Likes

The Onion is pretty good.

4 Likes

I’ll listen to NPR, mostly because it covers a lot of local news. But that shit is slanted HARD left.

3 Likes

Floridaman going hard with emotions

Nope

NPR has gone full SJW progressive
CNN is absolute trash
MSNBC oeddles consoiracy theories worse rhan alex jones could dream to
FOX news is still the same pro zionist shit
BBC is government sponsored propaganda

Really what you should do is focus in compiling facts, filter the trash and propganda, aggregate what is being said, and synthesize something useful out of it, rather than repeat the talking points that are ever ao subtly integrated into the “news” that networks feed you. We all went to college, we dont need “pundits and experts” telling us what is and isnt right.

2 Likes

Bro

I was listening to NPR the other day.

This broad was interviewing some senator about his switch in guns.

“What took so long for you to finally get it, when did it become ckear to you? Why dis it take so long?”

Holy fucking shit was that some subversive holier than thou, im fucking better than you sophistry. Absolute shit reporting

These congress hearings are so useless.
Republicans just attack your character.
Democrats just repeat the report and ask for confirmation.

Yawn.

5 Likes