SRK Mafia XIV: Musical Legends: Revenge of the Boybands ! Day 4!

If you want to throwaway your vote like that, might as well vote for Chief for putting you at the top of a list for all these killers to want to takeout. There’s still 21 hours to vote though to see if you’re starting something in the face of Oerba is probably going down with the majority.

OZ died because he played the game poorly. I called him out on shit and he was silent forever. He also had confirmed mafia defending him.

I like how I vote you, and your defence is “look what happened to OZ we can’t trust SoVi3t”. And you are still padding your posts with pointless questions.

I’m probably considered a valuable voice cuz I people already know in civ.

.

If I know Chief, “valuable voice” doesn’t necessarily mean “civilian”. Whole “give someone just enough rope to hang themselves” kinda deal. But, you know, I’m still “Not Helping” so you should probably ask him.

To be honest, you really aren’t.

Waaaay too many wallflowers and people posting just to keep their count up in this game.

What questions did you ask me to answer? How should I defend and talk about your 1 vote for me?

Freak out about them like SAD when he has votes on him? I have something here but not going to say it all in asking you what you want.

If I have time I am going to count how many question marks you have typed in this thread. Literally every post u have made is just useless banter and questions about EVERYTHING yet nothing useful. Basically you are just trying to be part of conversations to it in, but not actually helping.

U were also #2 on syn’s list so I ain’t the only one.

Edit: to fit in

And u asked me what questions I asked? None

But now that u bring it up, how about your top 5 suspects and Civs?

I don’t care if it’s true, it’s still really annoying. He largely ignores the “Not Helping” group since we historically haven’t been, but then how are we supposed to start helping if nobody will listen? Let’s be honest, almost nobody has commented on the back and forth between SAD & HAX. HAX has been putting forth a case that SAD is Mafia practically the whole game but there’s been minimal discussion about it, even from players we now know are civ like Syn.

Apparently, you somewhat inb4’d me, but my point remains.

Bah, now I’m in a sour mood. Going to bed.

I’m your #2, in line. your #1 was wrong. That’s it from you. Top 5 lists are stupid, especially now. So you’re saying 5 Mafia are left. You want a list of 5 civs, then a list (likely not 5 Mafia left) of 3 or 4 mafia, with 1 or 2 more civs on that list.

Guess my list should’ve had OZ and myself on it to be valuable.

Asking SAD what his thoughts are about the current day’s top 2 lynch targets several times is “useless,” when you say wallflowering is bad, just like asking him why did he start a bandwagon right after Aidebit only suspects Sovi3t, useless questions.

I applaud you for doing something that I am known for, and I don’t mean in this game and what you think about me with questions.

You really don’t remember me making this many posts before and think I am known as a wallflower?

My case on SAD just yesterday was that half his were only interacting with me. What are his other half about? I gave him an alibi and moved him from complete wallflower into the middle group, and if you believe Skizzz’s count, I points out he had 83 posts. Top 5 or 6. Yet what did he do in all of those?

These are rhetorical for you to think about and come to the same conclusions I am. Based on the facts. Since writing them all out again, is repeating my case just on a new page, so I don’t answer them for you. But if you want to wave away all of SAD’s wrongdoing because it links back to you, go ahead and continue doing that. I’ve said I don’t want to stop against SAD even if nobody else cares.

My questions changed how he has played, for the good: got him to play better as a civ if he’s a civ, or if he’s a mafia, he tightened up and changed how he was playing, which is bad. And is a tell.

“alibi” from being what you think is guilty, posting just enough to get by. That kind of playing defines him in this game, just enough to get by and look helpful. He brought out the big guns with he could be Vigi again as his last response. As a way to say backoff, but that’s part of my helping civilian wallflowers, asking them to not be so obvious about their roles and thinking wallflowers are safe from all kinds of threats, especially now after that crazier death count night.

Dude, rather than defend yourself u just tried to shift blame elsewhere…c’mon now!

And we dunno how many mafia are left for sure… Just an idea of how many there are/were

And I don’t mind being on a list of people to be killed

As I said before, I am no role civ, so mafia killing me is a waste of a kill for them and just helps the Civs out.

And me voting oerba when everybody else is doesn’t help…look how much you gave us just by me voting u.

I’m going to trust Syn and Chief on this one. We need to take care of some susp wallflowers sooner or later anyway since we can’t expect vigi (limited stock) and/or the potentional wesker to do it.

I’ll give it a few more hours as usual before locking in but it’s a lynch on Oerba as of now.

Is my name really that hard to tag? I need to try this @Blindknagg.

I hope ur not saying I claims to be vigi. Also my issue wasn’t with u posting just enough to get by. It’s the fact u only ask irrelevant questions very post. That way it seems like ur part if the group investigating yet in actuality ur just trying to seem like u fit in. Nothing with substance, just a bunch on potential “what ifs” and “what do u guys think about _____”. Basically questions that the mafia would use to lead investigations the way they wanted.

Got damn autocorrect fucked that post up :frowning:

@synonym actually didn’t do much to dissuade my Jesus toast theory that he might have been a sacrifice. I would’ve expected him to provide more detail on exactly what happened rather than just saying it’s a wesker-like role.

Nonetheless, I’ve already locked in on Oerba.

And @radicalfuzz: you seem awfully defensive…