SRK Mafia XIV: Musical Legends: Revenge of the Boybands ! Day 4!

[Missing_Person]

But DarkGeneral needs to be looked at hard, regardless of where the lynch goes today.

[GodotsRevenge]

You want to clarify when you knew Duke and AC were mafia?

When it was announced…

Good, might want to specify that - now the other one? Stop making me post so much to get these answers. You directly messed with me and I indirectly brought that up, and maybe forgot about the other things you did towards me so far besides that.

I didn’t read the part where it said we don’t know all the roles. DarkGeneral even corrected me, so there was no heat on you.

[WTF-AKUMA-HAX]

Wallflowers be wallflowers… I’m telling you now, I have yet to be Mafia. Is my behavior any different from when I had big roles or not and before? I need not to act differently because of some special role. Sure, I have some games under my belt but, are you really going to expect a fuck ton more from an established behavior as a wallflower?

Its not adding up.

You’ve done more harm than good.

Fine, to get you to a direction to work towards since you will have tunnel vision on your own defense, that’s standard for games to say “I’m not mafia, I’m civ and I know I’m civ” then tell people to tell you how you can prove it.

What do you think about today’s wallflowers? Godots answered the easy as shit question joke and ignored the rest of the real content. Oerba and OZ haven’t shown up with anything to say about the lynch result and night phase

[DarkGeneral]

The problem I have with leaving Oerba alive is that we always, always, ALWAYS end up killing all the high contributors and end up at end-game with a bunch of low-contributors. Just once let’s try it the other way around. My spidey sense is tickling around Oerba. If I’m wrong I’m happy to take a lynch to prove that I’m not trying to steer the civs away from the high posters in some sort of crazy mafia strategy.

*After you pushed for DukeC and he ended up being civ, you gained more of my trust. *

[Missing_Person]

OZ conflicts with my saying investigate passive players, but he’s one person that would GAF, and still bus someone even if it was mathematically bad for mafia to do so now.

[Missing_Person]

wouldn’t GAF*

[DarkGeneral]

*After you pushed for DukeC and he ended up being civ, you gained more of my trust. *

[/quote]

That should read “not being civ”

[WTF-AKUMA-HAX]

He can joke and disappear because you guys let him just do that. How hard was it to say:

“I went back through - the whole thread looking for anything about who was working with Duke and AC.” - yes we have to gather that from combining his last 2 posts, but he’s doing some vague “help” today that everyone can be doing, and miraculously found “nothing”

“I finally went thru the thread!” - sounds like a catchup post to get nobody to worry about him or talk to him, without the reason given why he’s not in the thread at all.

[Bious]

I am fine with lynching Oerba if he doesn’t post more.

Still waiting on Oz.

[DarkGeneral]

As far as who is left, I’d anticipate that anyone earlier in this phase was trying to start a wagon, and got it, they probably aren’t mafia. We’ve taken out two mafia in one night. ** They have at most, 4 left, I’d anticipate, just due to the game numbers.**

• You didn’t read the writeup thoroughly, as I’ve previously stated the writeup points to mafia having 5 left. *

[WTF-AKUMA-HAX]

Man I thought I was going to be the only one suspecting people today or something. Still was on get SAD mode that spilled over into anyone coming in here today.

We should be doing the Godots idea thing to find who was working with those 2 mafia. Any real names besides what someone did that is shady repeating everything so more people can see them and remember is going to be good for vigi and Uc consideration of our ideas.

[Oerba]

This might be very long, and so I’ll probably split it up into multiple posts once my phone starts slowing down (which it does for strange reasons). I think someone asked why I even play these games when I’m pretty quiet. Reason being is that I really enjoy the whole psychological aspect of trying to determine whether or not someone is tricking you without going off gestures or tone of voice. I don’t particularily enjoy starting these confrontations; I like to watch them unfold. So I watch from both sides, seeing how each side handles in. More so about winning or losing, I enjoy just learning from it. Winning is just icing on the cake. Starting post 2, my phone is slowing>…<

[Sumazndude]

Wallflowers be wallflowers… I’m telling you now, I have yet to be Mafia. Is my behavior any different from when I had big roles or not and before? I need not to act differently because of some special role. Sure, I have some games under my belt but, are you really going to expect a fuck ton more from an established behavior as a wallflower?

Its not adding up.

You’ve done more harm than good.

Fine, to get you to a direction to work towards since you will have tunnel vision on your own defense, that’s standard for games to say “I’m not mafia, I’m civ and I know I’m civ” then tell people to tell you how you can prove it.

What do you think about today’s wallflowers? Godots answered the easy as shit question joke and ignored the rest of the real content. Oerba and OZ haven’t shown up with anything to say about the lynch result and night phase

1). What’s not adding up?

2). Wallflowers? Is Godots avoiding questions? I don’t know what Oerba is up to because the only times he has posted (times I can remember without going back) is his reasoning for voting. (voting for me) Day 1, I thought his excuse was horrible. Day 2, I guess I can give him that but it won’t go without attention. OZ, I just straight up don’t know at the moment, he hasn’t posted in a while.

[WTF-AKUMA-HAX]

Godots avoided everything, Im not too sorry because by being here now I can talk to him & he’s finally answering day 1 stuff and has a plan to contribute.

you really going to say he’s not the biggest wallflower when his vote count was at like 2? When He helps nobody during lynch vote roundup?

[WTF-AKUMA-HAX]

post count. Ugh need a break

[Sumazndude]

Godots avoided everything, Im not too sorry because by being here now I can talk to him & he’s finally answering day 1 stuff and has a plan to contribute.

you really going to say he’s not the biggest wallflower when his vote count was at like 2? When He helps nobody during lynch vote roundup?

If you put it like that without the vote count, Every wallflower might as well be the biggest wallflower but, if every wallflower is the biggest, there is no biggest…

[Oerba]

As for my inactivity, I’m pretty busy. I drive 20 mins to school everyday, drive 40 mins back in rush hour and stay at school all day on Tues and Fri because that’s when my local casuals are. I’m taking the higher level of my accounting classes this semester as well, so I spend a lot of time studying. I don’t have a job where I use a computer: I have to sneak away and get on my phone, like I’m doing now, to look at the thread. So my only free time is at night, when I’m tired. So I read the thread for an hour or two, and subsequently fall asleep. Sometimes I’m awake enough to make a post. It’d be smarter for.me to be a spectator, but I like trying to hold.my own when I’m questioned too, it’s probably the most fun I get out of these.games While some of you post a lot, I spend my time reading a lot. When it gets near midgame and I feel like it’s not as overwhelming trying to read everyone I spend around an hour or two if my time permits reading the thread and/or making a post. When I get home from work I’ll make another post with info actually pertaining to the game.

[Vynce]

And we’ll be looking forward to it, @Oerba. You’ve been present for many games. I’d really like to hear your input, with that being so, and given what a rarity it is.

[Synonym]

I have posted all six of Oerba’s posts thus far in the spoiler below. There are things within them that just don’t gel with me. Especially since his most recent quote, bringing posts up to 7, paints a very different picture.

This might be very long, and so I’ll probably split it up into multiple posts once my phone starts slowing down (which it does for strange reasons). I think someone asked why I even play these games when I’m pretty quiet. Reason being is that I really enjoy the whole psychological aspect of trying to determine whether or not someone is tricking you without going off gestures or tone of voice. I don’t particularily enjoy starting these confrontations; I like to watch them unfold. So I watch from both sides, seeing how each side handles in. More so about winning or losing, I enjoy just learning from it. Winning is just icing on the cake. Starting post 2, my phone is slowing>…<

Collecting, formatting and writing up evidence is beyond hard while mobile so forgive me if this is brief.

The cliff-notes:

1. Oerba likes the challenge of determining guilt. And yet, he hasn’t had time to read the thread once for evidence. His lynch choices thus far have been based on being rushed, unsure of the deadlines and based on flimsy pretences. That doesn’t really sound like how you play these games at all.

2. The line about SAD being on mafia’s lists to try and cover themselves is clever but as I believe SAD to be innocent I’m more interested in the people vehemently insisting that he’s guilty. If you’ve been too busy to read the thread and make your own decisions how can you be certain that SAD is guilty?

3. This is literally all he has contributed, 0% of it useful to our cause. Anyone trying to make an argument in favour of keeping someone playing like this in the game over any active contributor is either ignorant or pushing another agenda.

In summary, Lynch Oerba.

Spoiler

Checking in. I’m sort of tired since I played around 8-10 hours of UMVC3 and have to go to work in 4 hours…zzz~

Bleh, I’m going to vote SAD.

Bleh, I’m going to vote SAD.

With 7 Hours and 52 Minutes left for Day 1, what brought you to your conclusion?

I didn’t have much time left to vote since I had school work to take care of. I saw your name pop up a few times within these pages and I just felt like voting for you. It’s early in the game, maybe as time goes on I’ll find reasons to not vote you. Something needs to get done in the beginning though.

Wtf people 236 posts…and because I got class tomorrow I’ll have to submit my vote now. I’ll try to reason it out a bit more rather than just say it as I did last time. I’m going to vote SAD. Part of what I don’t like in the beginning few day phases is that there are too many people. What this means to me is that it really damn hard trying to keep track of multiple people and arguments. The hardest players to read are the ones with volatile emotions, since you could chalk up any change in behavior to the fact that they are just extreme. So then as games wind down, the ones who are crazy have less shit to worry about and then just naturally start to calm as players they’ve suspected die and their roles get revealed, aka there’s more info out there.

So, I guess this ties into my vote for SAD since I feel time will tell when players like AC (which really doesn’t feel like long till he snaps) are mafia or not. SAD has been on numerous peoples list, but not quite the main focus on all their lists. I typically see this as a preemptive safe play in the case that he dies and is mafia, mafia people who put them on their lists will be able to back up any claims they decide to make later on. Seems like a simple easy to execute plan, considering SAD has been suspected since day 1. So by killing SAD I hope I’ll be able to narrow my focus onto those who suspected him (assuming he’s mafia).

Lol, I didn’t realize that I was browsing this thread past midnight last night, thought I only had until this morning to vote…Doesn’t change my stance on anything though. Will browse this thread once I get home in 2-3 hours.

Just reflecting on the whole jones role claim thing. The best case scenario is that he’s telling the truth and then what? He’s already admitted to not reading the tread or know what’s going on. So that would put him high on the mafia’s hit list for tonight. If we get a botched lynch today, that’s essentially THREE civ kills in a day, asuming he uses his “role” of course. Unless we were to believe him and wrap up the medic’s role on him tonight to avoid losing a bunch of civs. Suspicious
On the other hand, maybe he just wants a target on his back to draw eyes away from on of the more important roles. I just don’t understand how he could feel any particular role or player was in danger of getting killed tonight, so that idea is offer exclusive as a counter argument to the best case situation.

Third possibility is a bit more dangerous. Suspicions of AC are being carried over from day one, and Mafia should be fully aware of the possibility if not guaranteed lynching of AC today. Which incidentally has me hunting for mafia in the people who were jumping on AC before the bandwagon was allowed to get rolling. In the midst of confusion, the Mafia will try to do the inception thing.

The was I see it, Co_jones has pretty much nullified his own role by RCing, if he ever had a role to begin with. On the what I would say is the more likely side ( solely based on my paranoid thinking ) this is a brave Mafia move to get us to do something stupid. Even though it’s most likely not going to have any bearing on the vote today, I’ll most likely be voting for co-jones on principle.

Huh…interesting post. What’s the vote of voting on principle? Better yet, why announce that your voting on principle? If anything you should’ve just said that you’re voting TCJ and not said why you’re voting him and seen if you could get any odd responses. In the case that you’re killed and you’re mafia, voting TCJ would probably be the best choice for you since hardly, if anyone, is voting him. Gives the civ the least information if you will.

[The_Chief]

Maybe we lynch HAX?