He could be at his local library. I use to do that all the time when I had no internet at my house. I’d walk the 2 miles it took to get there. Worth it.
I’d like to hear more from resident powerhouses Pietastic, Synonym, and Chief. I speak in earnest. I’m not saying their lack of activity is suspicious. I haven’t been all that vocal myself, just yet.
Idk, SAD seems more panicky than usual. Same with Aidebit. Like I said he just flat out disagreed with me on AC like he knew something instead of asking me to offer up proof. That and he’s playing waaaaay too hard this go-around.
I’m still trying to puzzle out some of the game mechanics to be completely honest.
AC made a post of hypothetical mafia numbers earlier. I think he was close at 1:4, but I’d say that a 1:5 ratio of mafia:civilians is probably closer. It would explain Kaz’s desire to have 30 players in the game, as that would give us 6 mafia to 24 civilians.
I’m very, VERY interested to see where Chief’s reads are going. I can definitely see a few of them, but others not so much.
There is one player sending up a glaring flag and I want to see if Vynce or Chief are seeing it too.
@Synonym I might. I’ve got a tiny lead that depends on the allegiance of someone else. And a bigger one. I’ll ping you if I think I’m surfing on the same wave.
I’ll go with my tiny lead, for now. Sovi3t liking that post of Aidebit’s about remaining a wallflower. Now, this is why I don’t always share my leads, because my reasoning isn’t fair.
If Aidebit is dirty, Sovi3t looks dirty for supporting him, even to such a small extent. And If he’s innocent (Aid) Sovi3t looks like he was just not in support of lynching someone he knew for a fact was innocent (the implications of which you already know). So, either way, Sov looks bad for Liking a post. It’s illogical.
Thusly, it’s not something I’m looking to pursue right now. Even though he was oblivious to the game-start despite being active in GD.