The vote tallies for The Co-Jones are listed in alphabetical order. None of the others are, but the votes for MP are close. The votes for me are in alphabetical order I guess, too, but there were only two.
Well I was going to question Azure on going back on his word in regards to lynching CJ, but given today’s town hall results, that would warrant unnecessary suspicion on Azure.
I haven’t decided whether to scrutinise the No Lynchers or the No Voters tomorrow. I’m leaning towards the No Lynchers, since the No Voters may take care of themselves.
it seems pretty par for the course so far for a day one. Personally i’m going to avoid lynching someone based off a read today because those are always paper thin at this point in the game
What’s crazy to me is there’s 21 (now 20) civs and the detective still gets lynched.
How can 3 mafia members convince people to follow their lead? Amazing. I’m actually impressed.
Technically both mafia squads would want civs to blindly lynch wallflowers so we could say it was 6 people working in unison. In a way that logic would help mafia find other mafia in order to avoid attacking each other.
I believe Alpha was the first to bring up his name and it was for good reason. However, the issue isn’t that lynching wallflowers is dumb, its lynching wallflowers in this particular game setup is dumb.
People think oh, lets clear the dead weight, but then as we clear wallflower #4 on day 4, mafia is now able to kill/convert 5/6 civs per night.
Since day one is a straw reach, I decided to give every player a listing on the brawl roster and I would chose based upon the first choice selected by the Random character select.
I’m a little confused on the advantages of lynching active players over wallflowers (even though this probably isn’t what you’re suggesting). Is there a higher chance that more active players are Mafia than wallflowers? From what I’ve seen in the past, it looks like wallflower Mafia make it further than outspoken Mafia. Avoiding targeting wallflowers also encourages less talking from people in order to look less suspicious, which limits the amount of information we receive.
I’m not saying lynching wallflowers is always the way to go, but in the instance that we have little information to go on, it seems (to me) like we’re more likely to find a Mafia hiding in the wallflowers than in the active users.
I always put them in alphabetical order. I put The Chief after DG in one line accidently (I was doing it fast, it was 9:00 am and I had a 9:00 meeting), even the people who got 1 vote are in alphabetical order. I never reveal who voted in what order via the results. No Lynch was my bad, I did put ICege in the wrong spot.