I see you are very interested in this subject and that is good. However it seems you have misunderstood me to be on your level of enthusiasm. I made an offhanded comment but you took it as a challenge to debate. I thought my reply should have communicated my apathy but you took it as me being only concerned with aesthetics. My next reply should have shown how not insulted I felt but you took it that if you explained yourself differently I would understand you better. It looks like you have a lot to say about how bad SCV was. That’s fine but don’t tilt at windmills.